Effect of cold working on the corrosion resistance of JPCA stainless steel in flowing Pb–Bi at 450°C
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Development of a high performance proton beam window material is one of the critical issues for the deployment of the accelerator-driven transmutation system (ADS) with liquid Pb–Bi eutectic as a spallation target and coolant. In the present study, we applied 20% cold work treatment to JPCA austenitic stainless steel and investigated it from the corrosion behavior viewpoint. The corrosion test of 20% cold-worked JPCA SS has been carried in the JLBL-1 (JAEA Lead–Bismuth Loop-1) apparatus. The maximum temperature, the temperature difference, the flow velocity and the exposure time of the liquid Pb–Bi were 450 °C, 100 °C, 1 m/s, and 1000 h, respectively. For comparison analysis, JPCA SS without cold working was also tested in the same time and conditions with the 20% cold-worked JPCA SS. The results showed a different corrosion behavior between the JPCA SS without and with cold working. As for the JPCA SS without cold working, Pb–Bi penetrated into the matrix through a ferrite layer which was formed because of constituent metals dissolution from the matrix into Pb–Bi. As for the 20% cold-worked JPCA SS, dissolution attack occurred only partially and formed localized superficial pitting corrosion. It was found that the different corrosion behavior occurred because the cold working induced a structure transformation from γ-austenite to α′-martensite and affected the corrosion resistance of the JPCA SS in flowing Pb–Bi at 450 °C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Tsujimoto · Prog. Nucl Energy · 2000 · 37 · 33910.1016/S0149-1970(00)00068-8 ↗
2. Mukaiyama · Prog. Nucl Energy · 2001 · 38 · 10710.1016/S0149-1970(00)00098-6 ↗
3. Tsujimoto · Nucl. Tech. · 2008 · 161 · 31510.13182/NT08-A3929 ↗
4. Sugawara · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 398 · 24610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.040 ↗
5. Sugawara · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 47 · 95310.1080/18811248.2010.9720974 ↗
6. Kikuchi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 23210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.047 ↗
7. Yamamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 133–134 · 49310.1016/0022-3115(85)90196-5 ↗
8. Furuya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 133–134 · 85310.1016/0022-3115(85)90273-9 ↗
9. Tanaka · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1986 · 141–143 · 94310.1016/0022-3115(86)90122-4 ↗
10. Kurata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 141–143 · 2810.1016/S0022-3115(01)00720-6 ↗
11. Kurata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 373 · 16410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.051 ↗
12. A.K. Rivai, S. Saito, C. Kato, M. Tezuka, K. Kikuchi, in: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ), 26–28 March 2010, Mito, Ibaraki, Japan, 2010, p. 420.
13. Kikuchi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 318 · 34810.1016/S0022-3115(03)00017-5 ↗
14. K. Kikuchi, M. Tezuka, S. Saito, T. Onizawa, Y. Abe, K. Miura, in: Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ), 26–28 March 2010, Kochi, Japan, 2008, p. 224.
15. Kurata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 343 · 33310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.064 ↗
16. Ecer · Oxi. Met. · 1979 · 13 · 11910.1007/BF00611976 ↗
17. Langevoort · Oxi. Met. · 1984 · 21 · 27110.1007/BF00656836 ↗
18. Caplan · Corros. Sci. · 1970 · 10 · 910.1016/S0010-938X(70)80093-2 ↗