Operational limits under different wall conditions on TEXTOR-94
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Generally the operational range of tokamaks is limited by the β and the density limit. Experimentally it was found, that the appearance of MARFEs [B. Lipschultz, J. Nucl. Mater. 145–147 (1987) 15] inhibited an increase of the density significantly above the so-called Greenwald density (nGW) [M. Greenwald et al., Nucl. Fus. 28 (1988) 2199]. In TEXTOR-94 the onset of MARFEs has been investigated under different wall conditions. With fresh siliconization and fresh boronization the appearance of MARFEs can be postponed to higher densities ( N GW = n e /n GW =1.7 ). At those high densities n e =8×10 19 m −3 the Zeff is reduced to 1.3. But as important as the reduction of the global impurity content is the suppressed carbon release on the high-field-side (HFS) just after wall conditioning. Modeling of the MARFE onset by the codes B2-Eirene and TECXY demonstrates that an instability on the HFS due to deuterium recycling and radiation only leads to the formation of MARFEs at higher line-averaged densities in comparison to calculations which include carbon impurities. Complete suppression of MARFEs has been achieved by controlled displacement of the plasma column to the low-field-side (LFS), which reduces the local recycling and impurity release at the inner bumper limiter. This resulted in the highest densities achieved at TEXTOR-94 of NGW=2.1 independent of wall conditions. In this case the maximum achievable density is limited by a radiative collapse.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Greenwald · Nucl. Fus. · 1988 · 28 · 219910.1088/0029-5515/28/12/009 ↗
2. Weynants · Nucl. Fus. · 1999 · 39 · 163710.1088/0029-5515/39/11Y/303 ↗
3. Mank · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 231210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2312 ↗
4. Winter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1990 · 176&177 · 1410.1016/0022-3115(90)90025-I ↗
5. Samm · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 220–222 · 2510.1016/0022-3115(94)00444-7 ↗
6. G. Sergienko et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Plasma Physics Control Fusion, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Europhys. Conf. Abstr., vol. 23J, 1999, p. 725
7. Rapp · Nucl. Fus. · 1999 · 39 · 76510.1088/0029-5515/39/6/305 ↗
8. de Vries · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 351910.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3519 ↗
9. Tokar · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 95810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00680-1 ↗
10. Stäbler · Nucl. Fus. · 1992 · 32 · 155710.1088/0029-5515/32/9/I05 ↗
11. Rogister · Phys. Plasmas · 1995 · 2 · 272910.1063/1.871237 ↗
12. J. Rapp et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, Japan, 1998, Fusion Energy (IAEA, Vienna 1999), vol. 2, p. 781
13. Schüller · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fus. · 1995 · 37 · A13510.1088/0741-3335/37/11A/009 ↗
14. J. Rapp et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Plasma Physics Control Fusion, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Europhys. Conf. Abstr., vol. 23J, 1999, p. 665
15. U. Samm, The TEXTOR-94 Team, Plasma Phys. Contr. Fus. 41 (1999) B5710.1088/0741-3335/41/12B/304 ↗
16. Samm · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 66610.1016/S0022-3115(98)00516-9 ↗
17. D. Reiser et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Plasma Physics Control Fusion, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 1999, Europhys. Conf. Abstr., vol. 23J, 1999, p. 697
18. Zagórski · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2000 · 40 · 40510.1002/1521-3986(200006)40:3/4<405::AID-CTPP405>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
19. D. Reiser, M.Z. Tokar, in: P. Pavlo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Plasma Physics Control Fusion, Prague, Czech Republic, Europhys. Conf. Abstr., vol. 22C (Geneva: European Physical Society), 1998, p. 1828