The feasibility of recycling and clearance of active materials from fusion power plants
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to minimize the quantity of active materials that require long-term storage, arising during operation and after fusion power plant decommissioning, maximum use should be made of both recycling within the nuclear industry and clearance. For the latter, revised limits have been recently issued at the international level and in the US and Europe. In this paper the implications for fusion materials of these new levels are considered. Concerning recycling, power plant studies have employed criteria based solely on radiological parameters. Reviews of remote procedures currently used within the nuclear industry suggest that these criteria have been unduly conservative and should be revised.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Taylor · Fus. Technol. · 2001 · 39 · 35010.13182/FST01-A11963259 ↗
2. L. El-Guebaly, R.A. Forrest, T.D. Marshall, N.P. Taylor, K. Tobita, M. Zucchetti, Current challenges facing recycling and clearance of fusion radioactive materials, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute Report, UWFDM-1285, 2005. Available at: .
3. International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources, Safety Series No. 115, IAEA, Vienna, 1996.
4. International Atomic Energy Agency, Application of the concepts of exclusion, exemption and clearance, IAEA Safety Standards Series, No. RS-G-1.7, 2004. Available at: .
5. International Atomic Energy Agency, Clearance levels for radionuclides in solid materials: application of the exemption principles, Interim Report for Comment, IAEA TECDOC- 855, 1996.
6. Rocco · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 147310.1016/S0022-3115(00)00127-6 ↗
7. El-Guebaly · Fus. Technol. · 2001 · 39 · 98610.13182/FST01-A11963370 ↗
8. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Radiological Assessments for Clearance of Materials from Nuclear Facilities, Washington, DC, Main Report NUREG-1640, 2003. Available at: .
9. El-Guebaly · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 49 · 6210.13182/FST06-2 ↗
10. Cook · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 47 · 38410.13182/FST05-A719 ↗
11. Zucchetti · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 54 · 63510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00576-7 ↗
12. R.A. Forrest, N.P. Taylor, R. Pampin, in: Presented at First IAEA Technical Meeting on First Generation of Fusion Power Plant – Design and Technology, 5–7 July, 2005, Vienna, Austria, IAEA TM-27424, 2006.
13. Nishio · J. Plasma Fus. Res. · 2002 · 78 · 121810.1585/jspf.78.1218 ↗
14. Konishi · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2002 · 63&64 · 1110.1016/S0920-3796(02)00264-8 ↗
15. Tobita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 161010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.139 ↗
16. El-Guebaly · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 132110.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.093 ↗
17. El-Guebaly · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A · 2005 · 544 · 10410.1016/j.nima.2005.01.199 ↗
18. M. Klein, L. Ooms, V. Massaut, Recycling of the Solid Metallic Parts of the Blanket Modules and Divertor, SCK·CEN Report R-3686, Mol, Belgium, 2003.
19. L. Ooms, V. Massaaut, Feasibility of Fusion Waste Recycling, SCK·CEN Report R-4056, Mol, Belgium, 2005.
20. International Atomic Energy Agency, Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1, 2005.