journal article·2015-08

Edge plasma physics modifications due to magnetic ripple in RFX-mod

P. Scarin, M. Agostini, L. Carraro, R. Cavazzana, G. Ciaccio, G. De Masi, G. Spizzo, M. Spolaore, N. Vianello

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The edge of the RFX-mod (R = 2 m, a = 0.46 m) Reversed Field Pinch is characterized by weak magnetic chaos affecting ion and electron diffusion. Edge particle transport is strongly influenced by a toroidal asymmetry caused by magnetic islands. An ambipolar radial electric field ensures local neutrality and possesses the same symmetry as the parent magnetic ripple: the result is the modulation of the perpendicular flow, with a slowing-down at the island X-point. In this paper we present a complete statistical analysis, over a large database of RFX-mod discharges, of the edge properties as they are modified by the magnetic topology: the plasma wall footprint follows the helical shape of the dominant central mode (m/n = 1/7), with an increase of H? emission and electron density corresponding to the O-point of the inner magnetic island. Edge turbulence is modified by the magnetic topology, being generated in the O-point region and damped near the X-point.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Plasma Diagnostics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Vianello · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 07302510.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073025 ↗
2. Feng · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2011 · 53 · 02400910.1088/0741-3335/53/2/024009 ↗
3. Moyer · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 12301910.1088/0029-5515/52/12/123019 ↗
4. Kirk · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 25500310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.255003 ↗
5. Chapman · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 10501310.1088/0741-3335/54/10/105013 ↗
6. Schmitz · Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 02400910.1088/0029-5515/48/2/024009 ↗
7. Spizzo · Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 05610210.1063/1.4872173 ↗
8. Scarin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S55010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.114 ↗
9. Martines · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 03501410.1088/0029-5515/50/3/035014 ↗
10. Agostini · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 06500310.1088/0741-3335/54/6/065003 ↗
11. Agostini · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2010 · 81 · 10D71510.1063/1.3478679 ↗
12. De Masi · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 05301610.1088/0029-5515/51/5/053016 ↗
13. Stoschus · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 08300210.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083002 ↗
14. www.adas.ac.uk.
15. G. Ciaccio et al., submitted to Nucl. Fusion (2014).
16. Spolaore · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S43710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.029 ↗
17. De Masi · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2010 · 50 · 82410.1002/ctpp.201010139 ↗
18. Agostini · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2014 · 56 · 09501610.1088/0741-3335/56/9/095016 ↗
19. Spolaore · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 16500110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.165001 ↗
20. Myra · Phys. Plasmas · 2006 · 13 · 09250910.1063/1.2355668 ↗
21. D’Ippolito · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2004 · 44 · 20510.1002/ctpp.200410030 ↗
22. Horton · 1996
23. Scarin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390 · 44410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.129 ↗