Statistical determination of stress threshold and survival analysis on IASCC initiation data of stainless steels in pressurized water reactor conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the first attempt to perform a rigorous statistical analysis of the compiled IASCC initiation data of 304 and 316 stainless steels available in the existing literature. First, the stress threshold for IASCC initiation was determined statistically as a function of the neutron dose. The 95% lower bound or 2.5% cumulative failure probability line appeared to be a conservative stress threshold, although it could be adjusted according to the required conservatism. Survival analysis was conducted using the filtered data set for 316 stainless steel IASCC initiation times. A proportional hazards model revealed statistically significant covariates in order of greatest impact: stress level as a percentage of irradiated yield strength, neutron dose, and component. Unsurprisingly, the failure rate was found to increase with increasing stress level and neutron dose. It was also found that FTT materials had higher failure rates than BFB materials. The effects of these covariates on the failure rate were constant with time. An accelerated life model based on a Weibull distribution was then used to model the IASCC initiation time. Two different link functions were used for the model: the link function with a power-law form for the stress level and neutron dose fitted the observed data better than a log-linear type link function.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. U. Ehrnsten, Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of austenitic stainless steels, in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Volume 5, R. J. M. Konings, Ed., Elsevier, 2012, pp. 93–104.10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00080-X ↗
2. A historical perspective on understanding IASCC10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.01.057 ↗
3. Microstructure, mechanical properties and IASCC susceptibility of stainless steel baffle bolts after 30 years of operation in a PWR10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152615 ↗
4. A model for the normal stress dependence of intergranular cracking of irradiated 316L stainless steel in supercritical water10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.012 ↗
5. Strain incompatibilities and their role in intergranular cracking of irradiated 316L stainless steel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.021 ↗
6. Crack initiation behavior of neutron irradiated model and commercial stainless steels in high temperature water10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.008 ↗
7. The role of dislocation channeling in IASCC initiation of neutron irradiated stainless steel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.09.001 ↗
8. Quantitative analysis of localized stresses in irradiated stainless steels using high resolution electron backscatter diffraction and molecular dynamics modeling10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.01.017 ↗
9. Quantitative linkage between the stress at dislocation channel-Grain boundary interaction sites and irradiation assisted stress corrosion crack initiation10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.032 ↗
10. IASCC of neutron irradiated 316 stainless steel to 125 dpa10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110897 ↗
11. A micromechanical analysis of intergranular stress corrosion cracking of an irradiated austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116482 ↗
12. 2007
13. J. Conermann, R. Shogan, K. Fujimoto, T. Yonezawa and Y. Yamaguchi, Irradiation effects in a highly irradiated cold worked stainless steel removed from a commercial PWR, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems-Water Reactors, Salt Lake City, 2005.
14. IASCC initiation in highly irradiated stainless steels under uniaxial constant load conditions10.1080/18811248.2008.9711894 ↗
15. C. Pokor, J.-P. Massoud, M. Wintergerst, A. Toivonen, U. Ehrnstén and W. Karlsen, Determination of the time to failure curve as a function of stress for a highly irradiated AISI 304 stainless steel after constant load tests in simulated PWR water environment, Fontevraud 7: Contribution of Materials Investigation to Improve the Safety and Performance of LWRs, Avignon, France, 2010.
16. Crack initiation testing of thimble tube material under PWR conditions to determine a stress threshold for IASCC10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.02.038 ↗
17. K. Takakura, K. Nakata, M. Ando, K. Fujimoto and E. Wachi, Lifetime evaluation for IASCC initiation of cold worked 316 stainless steel's BFB in PWR primary water, in International conference on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems, Whistler, 2007.
18. K. Takakura, K. Nakata, N. Kubo, K. Fujimoto and K. Sakima, IASCC evaluation method of irradiated cold worked 316ss baffle former bolt in PWR primary water, in Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference PVP2009, July 26-30, 2009, Prague, Czech Republic, PVP2009-77279.10.1115/PVP2009-77279 ↗
19. Crack initiation of neutron-irradiated 304L stainless steel in PWR primary water10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109902 ↗
20. McCool · 2012
21. H. Rinne, The Weibull distribution: a Handbook, CRC press, 2008.10.1201/9781420087444 ↗
22. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
23. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample
24. On a local limit theorem of the theory of probability
25. A comparison of maximum likelihood and median-rank regression for Weibull estimation10.1080/08982112.2010.503447 ↗
26. A. Gelman, J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, D.B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D.B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis, CRC press, 2013.10.1201/b16018 ↗
27. Y. Liu and A.I. Abeyratne, Practical Applications of Bayesian Reliability, John Wiley & Sons, 2019.10.1002/9781119287995 ↗
28. M. Plummer, A. Stukalov, and M. Denwood, rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC, 2022. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rjags/index.html.
29. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences10.1214/ss/1177011136 ↗
30. Leemis, L.M. (1995). Reliability: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc..
31. X. Liu, Survival Analysis: Models and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.10.1002/9781118307656 ↗
32. T. Therneau, The comprehensive R archive network, 23 August 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/survival.pdf. [Accessed 11 November 2021].
33. T. Therneau, C. Crowson and E. Atkinson, The comprehensive R archive network, 23 August 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/timedep.pdf. [Accessed 21 November 2021].
34. Impact of the model-building strategy on inference about nonlinear and time-dependent covariate effects in survival analysis10.1002/sim.6178 ↗
35. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model10.1093/biomet/69.1.239 ↗
36. Stress corrosion life assessment of 182 and 82 welds used in PWR components
37. M. Erickson, F. Ammirato, B. Brust, D. Dedhia, E. Focht, M. Kirk, C. Lange, R. Olsen, P. Scott, D. Shim, G. Steven, G. White, Models and Inputs Selected for Use in the xLPR Pilot Study, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, 2011. 1022528.
38. Statistical analysis of parameter estimation of a probabilistic crack initiation model for Alloy 182 weld considering right-censored data and the covariate effect10.1016/j.net.2017.09.005 ↗
39. Development of probabilistic primary water stress corrosion cracking initiation model for alloy 182 welds considering thermal aging and cold work effects10.1016/j.net.2020.12.005 ↗
40. R. Staehle, “Bases for predicting the earliest penetrations due to SCC for alloy 600 on the secondary side of PWR steam generators,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2001), Report No. NUREG/CR-6737.
41. Internal oxidation and probabilistic fracture model of irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking in stainless steels10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.08.018 ↗