journal article·2023-04Open access

Microstructure-process relationships in monolithic U-10Mo fuel foil single-pass rolling: A parametric simulation study

William E. Frazier, Lei Li, Kyoo Sil Choi, Yucheng Fu, Zhijie Xu, Vineet V. Joshi, Ayoub Soulami

Abstract

A previously validated coupling of Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) Potts Model and finite element method (FEM) simulations was implemented to investigate the effects of microstructural features in as-cast and homogenized monolithic U-10Mo foils on the emergent microstructure after rolling and reheating. Parameters that could potentially affect recrystallization behavior of the rolled U-10Mo foils were considered: grain size distribution, uranium carbide (UC) size distribution, UC volume fraction, spatial distribution of UC, and rolling reduction magnitude. Grain structure and the magnitude of rolling reduction have the strongest influence on recrystallization kinetics and the fabricated grain size distribution. The UC distribution had only a weak effect on the recrystallization kinetics and final microstructures. While particle-stimulated nucleation (PSN) occurred in simulation more frequently as grain size increased, its incidence did not appear to considerably affect the recrystallization kinetics or grain size distribution.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. E.J. Kautz, A. Devaraj, L. Kovarik, C.A. Lavender, and V. V Joshi: Effect of Silicon in U-10Mo Alloy, Richland, WA, 2017.10.2172/1400353 ↗
2. Frazier · Metallurg. Mater. Trans. A · 2019 · 51 · 53310.1007/s11661-019-05582-6 ↗
3. S. Jana, A. Schemer-Korhn, N. Overman, L. Sweet, E. Kautz, C. Lavender, and V. Joshi: Eutectoid transformation in U10Mo alloy : effect of deformation history and homogenization heat treatment, 2019.10.2172/1503687 ↗
4. E.A. Nyberg, V.V. Joshi, C.A. Lavender, D.M. Paxton, and D.E. Burkes: Influence of Homogenization on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of the U-10Mo Alloy, Richland, WA, 2014.10.2172/1339936 ↗
5. Joshi · 2015 · 465
6. Joshi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 80510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.065 ↗
7. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 471 · 15410.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.026 ↗
8. Frazier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2019 · 513 · 5610.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.046 ↗
9. Kalia · 2019
10. Frazier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2018 · 498 · 25410.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.041 ↗
11. Frazier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2019 · 52610.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151763 ↗
12. Wang · 2019
13. Park · 2014 · 447
14. Ozaltun · 2011 · 419
15. Jana · 2017 · 496
16. Hu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 480 · 32310.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.038 ↗
17. Frazier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2019 · 524 · 16410.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.07.004 ↗
18. Kautz · Microsc. Microanal. · 2019 · 25 · 251810.1017/S1431927619013321 ↗
19. R. Newell, A. Mehta, D.D. Keiser, and Y. Sohn: J. Nucl. Mater., DOI:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151983.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151983 ↗
20. Hu · JOM · 2017 · 69 · 255410.1007/s11837-017-2611-4 ↗
21. Cheng · Mater. Sci. Eng.: A · 2018 · 736 · 4110.1016/j.msea.2018.08.040 ↗
22. Hu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2018 · 500 · 27010.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.042 ↗
23. R. Montoya, D. John, R. James, K. Diederik, E. Jeffrey, and J. Dwayne: Annealing of (DU-10Mo)-Zr Co-Rolled Foils, 2017.
24. J.I. Reeve, B.J. Schuessler, W.E. Frazier, D.P. Field, and V. v. Joshi: J. Nucl. Mater., DOI:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153445.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153445 ↗
25. Hughes · 2012
26. Goins · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 124 · 41110.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.017 ↗
27. Zöllner · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 86 · 9910.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.044 ↗
28. Frazier · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 18510.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109945 ↗
29. Raabe · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 161710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00451-6 ↗
30. Quey · Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. · 2011 · 200 · 172910.1016/j.cma.2011.01.002 ↗
31. Kautz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2021 · 554 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152949 ↗
32. Schuessler · Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 52 · 387110.1007/s11661-021-06349-8 ↗
33. Huang · JMADE · 2016 · 111 · 548
34. F.J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly: Recrystalization and Related Annealing Phenomena, Second Edi., 2004.10.1016/B978-008044164-1/50016-5 ↗
35. Figueroa · Mater. Charact. · 2018 · 138 · 26310.1016/j.matchar.2018.02.017 ↗
36. Adam · Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 48 · 206210.1007/s11661-017-3967-3 ↗
37. Goetz · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 52 · 85110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.012 ↗
38. Xu · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 515710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.045 ↗
39. A. DeMint, J. Gooch, R.J. Dunavant, and T.C. Andes: Update on Uranium-Molybdenum Fuel Foil Fabrication Activities At the Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, TN, 2007.
40. S.D. Imhoff, H. Swenson, K.E. Luitjohan, G.A. Kral, and R.T. Forsyth: FY19 Report: Effect of Filtration on Inclusion and Carbon Reduction, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 2019.10.2172/1577999 ↗
41. Mei · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2020 · 54210.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152257 ↗
42. Doherty · Curr. Iss. Recrystallizat.: A Rev. · 1997 · 238
43. Manohar · ISIJ Int. · 1998 · 38 · 91310.2355/isijinternational.38.913 ↗
44. C.S. Smith: Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Eng., 1948, vol. 175, pp. 15–51.