journal article·2013-07Open access

Effect of n=3 perturbation field amplitudes below the ELM triggering threshold on edge and SOL transport in NSTX

J.D. Lore, J.M. Canik, J.-W. Ahn, A. Bortolon, E.D. Fredrickson, M.A. Jaworski, G.J. Kramer, R. Maingi, A.G. McLean, F. Scotti, V.A. Soukhanovskii, K. Tritz

Abstract

Here, the pulsed application of n = 3 magnetic perturbation fields with amplitudes below that which triggers ELMs results in distinct, transient responses observable on several edge and divertor diagnostics in NSTX. We refer to these responses as Sub-Threshold Edge Perturbations (STEPs). An analysis of edge measurements suggests that STEPs result in increased transport in the plasma edge and scrape-off layer, which leads to augmentation of the intrinsic strike point splitting due to error fields, i.e., an intensification of the helical divertor footprint flux pattern. These effects are much smaller in magnitude than those of triggered ELMs, and are observed for the duration of the field perturbation measured internal to the vacuum vessel. In addition, STEPs are correlated with changes to the MHD activity, along with transient reductions in the neutron production rate. Ideally the STEPs could be used to provide density control and prevent impurity accumulation, in the same manner that on-demand ELM triggering is used on NSTX, without the impulsive divertor fluxes and potential for damage to plasma facing components associated with ELMs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Shoji · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196 · 29610.1016/S0022-3115(06)80049-8 ↗
2. Evans · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 23500310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.235003 ↗
3. Kaye · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 17500210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.175002 ↗
4. Liang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 26500410.1103/PhysRevLett.98.265004 ↗
5. Suttrop · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 22500410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.225004 ↗
6. Kim · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 11401110.1088/0029-5515/52/11/114011 ↗
7. Canik · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 04500110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.045001 ↗
8. Canik · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 06401610.1088/0029-5515/50/6/064016 ↗
9. Ahn · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 04501010.1088/0029-5515/50/4/045010 ↗
10. Ahn · Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 05610810.1063/1.3574522 ↗
11. Loarte · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2007
12. Canik · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 03401210.1088/0029-5515/50/3/034012 ↗
13. Sabbagh · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 04500410.1103/PhysRevLett.97.045004 ↗
14. Evans · 2008
15. Maingi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 13500410.1103/PhysRevLett.105.135004 ↗
16. Evans · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2005 · 7 · 174
17. Jakubowski · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09501310.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095013 ↗
18. Nardon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S91410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.072 ↗
19. Harting · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 05400910.1088/0029-5515/52/5/054009 ↗
20. Scotti · Rev. Sci. Inst. · 2012 · 83 · 10E53210.1063/1.4739510 ↗
21. Zweben · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2007 · 49 · S110.1088/0741-3335/49/7/S01 ↗
22. Physics of plasmas close to thermonuclear conditions
23. Fredrickson · Phys. Plasmas · 2006 · 13 · 05610910.1063/1.2178788 ↗