journal article·2015-10

Effect of pre-strain on susceptibility of Indian Reduced Activation Ferritic Martensitic Steel to hydrogen embrittlement

Sagar Sonak, Abhishek Tiwari, Uttam Jain, Nachiket Keskar, Sanjay Kumar, Ram N. Singh, Gautam K. Dey

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The role of pre-strain on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of Indian Reduced Activation Ferritic Martensitic Steel was investigated using constant nominal strain-rate tension test. The samples were pre-strained to different levels of plastic strain and their mechanical behavior and mode of fracture under the influence of hydrogen was studied. The effect of plastic pre-strain in the range of 0.5–2% on the ductility of the samples was prominent. Compared to samples without any pre-straining, effect of hydrogen was more pronounced on pre-strained samples. Prior deformation reduced the material ductility under the influence of hydrogen. Up to 35% reduction in the total strain was observed under the influence of hydrogen in pre-strained samples. Hydrogen charging resulted in increased occurrence of brittle zones on the fracture surface. Hydrogen Enhanced Decohesion (HEDE) was found to be the dominant mechanism of fracture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Raj · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 7210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.032 ↗
2. Raj · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 146010.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.008 ↗
3. Jung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 12410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00326-2 ↗
4. Michler · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2010 · 35 · 974610.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.071 ↗
5. Takagi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.057 ↗
6. ASM Handbook · 1986 · vol. 11
7. Splichal · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.053 ↗
8. Splichal · Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. · 2012 · 89 · 4210.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.006 ↗
9. Yagodzinskyy · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 444 · 43510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.026 ↗
10. Maday · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2005 · 75–79 · 95710.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.024 ↗
11. Maday · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 51610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.107 ↗
12. Marchetti · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2011 · 36 · 1588010.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.096 ↗
13. Esteban · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 263410.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.02.002 ↗
14. Esteban · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 47310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.114 ↗
15. Parvathavarthini · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 264 · 3510.1016/S0022-3115(98)00486-3 ↗
16. Hurtado Noreña · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 41010.1016/j.msea.2009.08.025 ↗
17. Leblond · Acta Metall. · 1987 · 35 · 170310.1016/0001-6160(87)90116-7 ↗
18. Hong · Acta Metall. · 1984 · 32 · 158110.1016/0001-6160(84)90217-7 ↗
19. Oriani · Acta Metall. · 1970 · 18 · 14710.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-7 ↗
20. Brass · Corros. Sci. · 2006 · 48 · 48110.1016/j.corsci.2005.01.007 ↗
21. Koyama · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 70 · 17410.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.048 ↗