Effect of pre-strain on susceptibility of Indian Reduced Activation Ferritic Martensitic Steel to hydrogen embrittlement
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The role of pre-strain on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of Indian Reduced Activation Ferritic Martensitic Steel was investigated using constant nominal strain-rate tension test. The samples were pre-strained to different levels of plastic strain and their mechanical behavior and mode of fracture under the influence of hydrogen was studied. The effect of plastic pre-strain in the range of 0.5–2% on the ductility of the samples was prominent. Compared to samples without any pre-straining, effect of hydrogen was more pronounced on pre-strained samples. Prior deformation reduced the material ductility under the influence of hydrogen. Up to 35% reduction in the total strain was observed under the influence of hydrogen in pre-strained samples. Hydrogen charging resulted in increased occurrence of brittle zones on the fracture surface. Hydrogen Enhanced Decohesion (HEDE) was found to be the dominant mechanism of fracture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Raj · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 7210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.032 ↗
2. Raj · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 146010.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.008 ↗
3. Jung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 12410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00326-2 ↗
4. Michler · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2010 · 35 · 974610.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.071 ↗
5. Takagi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.057 ↗
6. ASM Handbook · 1986 · vol. 11
7. Splichal · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.053 ↗
8. Splichal · Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. · 2012 · 89 · 4210.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.006 ↗
9. Yagodzinskyy · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 444 · 43510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.026 ↗
10. Maday · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2005 · 75–79 · 95710.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.024 ↗
11. Maday · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 51610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.107 ↗
12. Marchetti · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2011 · 36 · 1588010.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.096 ↗
13. Esteban · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 263410.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.02.002 ↗
14. Esteban · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 47310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.114 ↗
15. Parvathavarthini · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 264 · 3510.1016/S0022-3115(98)00486-3 ↗
16. Hurtado Noreña · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 41010.1016/j.msea.2009.08.025 ↗
17. Leblond · Acta Metall. · 1987 · 35 · 170310.1016/0001-6160(87)90116-7 ↗
18. Hong · Acta Metall. · 1984 · 32 · 158110.1016/0001-6160(84)90217-7 ↗
19. Oriani · Acta Metall. · 1970 · 18 · 14710.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-7 ↗
20. Brass · Corros. Sci. · 2006 · 48 · 48110.1016/j.corsci.2005.01.007 ↗
21. Koyama · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 70 · 17410.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.048 ↗