journal article·2024-12Open access

Parameterization of vacancy production rate in phase-field models of fission gas bubble evolution in nuclear fuel

Larry K. Aagesen

Abstract

Phase-field modeling has increasingly been used to study microstructural evolution in fission gas bubbles in nuclear fuel to improve understanding of fission gas release. To improve computational efficiency, often only vacancies and gas atoms are included as defect species. In this case, the net effects of vacancy and interstitial production, recombination, and biased sink absorption are included as a net vacancy source, or net vacancy source combined with an effective sink. However, there has been a lack of clarity on what parameter values should be used for these approaches to best match the more complete physical picture that includes interstitials and vacancies. Here, we compare a phase-field model of void growth to analytical models for the source-only and source plus sink approach to gain insight into how the phase-field models can be parameterized effectively. The source-only approach provides greater flexibility to match growth rates determined from the full vacancy-interstitial picture. A strategy was developed for determining the value of the net vacancy source term by comparing to an analytical model that includes vacancy and interstitial production, recombination, and biased sink absorption. This strategy can be used to parameterize phase-field models of fission gas bubble growth.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Unit mechanisms of fission gas release: current understanding and future needs10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.016 ↗
2. Multiscale modeling of fission gas behavior in U3Si2 under LWR conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.037 ↗
3. Swelling of uranium by mechanical cavitation10.1016/0022-3115(64)90039-X ↗
4. R.G. Pahl, D.L. Porter, C.E. Lahm, G.L. Hofman, Experimental studies of U-Pu-Zr fast-reactor fuel-pins in the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II, Metall. Mater. Trans., A, Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 21 (7), 1863–1869.10.1007/BF02647233 ↗
5. Swelling behavior of U-Pu-Zr fuel10.1007/BF02671924 ↗
6. Phase-field modeling of gas bubbles and thermal conductivity evolution in nuclear fuels10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.017 ↗
7. Phase-field simulation of irradiated metals part II: gas bubble kinetics10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.032 ↗
8. Phase-field simulations of intragranular fission gas bubble evolution in UO2 under post-irradiation thermal annealing10.1016/j.nimb.2012.11.028 ↗
9. Formation mechanism of gas bubble superlattice in UMo metal fuels: phase-field modeling investigation10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.07.012 ↗
10. Three-dimensional phase-field simulations of intragranular gas bubble evolution in irradiated U-Mo fuel10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.061 ↗
11. Phase-field modeling of fission gas bubble growth on grain boundaries and triple junctions in UO2 nuclear fuel10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.019 ↗
12. A quantitative phase-field model of gas bubble evolution in UO210.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109867 ↗
13. Phase-field simulations of intergranular fission gas bubble behavior in U3Si2 nuclear fuel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152415 ↗
14. Phase-field simulations of fission gas bubbles in high burnup UO2 during steady-state and LOCA transient conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153267 ↗
15. Network percolation using a two-species included phase model to predict fission gas accommodation and venting10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.12.036 ↗
16. Modelling the growth and evolution of statistically significant populations of intergranular fission gas bubbles by IPM10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153777 ↗
17. Phase-field simulations of fission gas bubble growth and interconnection in U-(Pu)-Zr nuclear fuel
18. Phase-field simulation of radiation-induced bubble evolution in recrystallized U-Mo alloy10.1016/j.net.2021.07.034 ↗
19. Modeling mesoscale fission gas behavior in UO2 by directly coupling the phase field method to spatially resolved cluster dynamics
20. Olander · 1976
21. Cluster dynamics simulation of xenon diffusion during irradiation in UO210.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152326 ↗
22. Abramowitz · 1972
23. Phase-field model for binary alloys10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
24. Cluster dynamics simulation of uranium self-diffusion during irradiation in UO210.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151787 ↗
25. MOOSE: enabling massively parallel multiphysics simulation10.1016/j.softx.2020.100430 ↗
26. Hales · 2015
27. The development of grain-face porosity in irradiated oxide fuel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.10.008 ↗