Influence of displacement damage on deuterium and helium retention in austenitic and ferritic-martensitic alloys considered for ADS service
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The behavior of ion-implanted hydrogen (deuterium) and helium in austenitic 18Cr10NiTi stainless steel, EI-852 ferritic steel and ferritic/martensitic steel EP-450 and their interaction with displacement damage were investigated. Energetic argon irradiation was used to produce displacement damage and bubble formation to simulate nuclear power environments. The influence of damage morphology and the features of radiation-induced defects on deuterium and helium trapping in structural alloys was studied using ion implantation, the nuclear reaction D( 3 He,p) 4 He, thermal desorption spectrometry and transmission electron microscopy. It was found in the case of helium irradiation that various kinds of helium-radiation defect complexes are formed in the implanted layer that lead to a more complicated spectra of thermal desorption. Additional small changes in the helium spectra after irradiation with argon ions to a dose of ≤25 dpa show that the binding energy of helium with these traps is weakly dependent on the displacement damage. It was established that retention of deuterium in ferritic and ferritic-martensitic alloys is three times less than in austenitic steel at damage of ∼1 dpa. The retention of deuterium in steels is strongly enhanced by presence of radiation damages created by argon ion irradiation, with a shift in the hydrogen release temperature interval of 200 K to higher temperature. At elevated temperatures of irradiation the efficiency of deuterium trapping is reduced by two orders of magnitude.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Henry · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 318 · 24910.1016/S0022-3115(03)00118-1 ↗
2. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 6610.1016/S0022-3115(01)00562-1 ↗
3. Zhanbing · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 398 · 8110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.014 ↗
4. Tolstolutskaya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 13610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.022 ↗
5. Tolstolutskaya · Problems Atomic Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 4 · 29
6. ASTM E521-96, 2009, ASTM.
7. www.srim.org.
8. Kalchenko · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 399 · 11410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.01.010 ↗
9. Ono · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 102610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.090 ↗
10. Ono · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 93310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.061 ↗
11. Oliver · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 14810.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.025 ↗
12. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 431 · 5710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.011 ↗
13. Carvalho · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 54810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.08.022 ↗
14. Sugano · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 94210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.059 ↗
15. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 18110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.088 ↗
16. Karpov · Met. I Noveishie Teknol. · 2004 · 12 · 1661
17. Myers · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1983 · 30 · 117510.1109/TNS.1983.4332483 ↗
18. Norskov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 49 · 142010.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1420 ↗
19. Hamaguchi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 37510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.124 ↗
20. Ono · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 452 · 4610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.043 ↗
21. Tolstolutskaya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S71010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.053 ↗
22. Karpov · Problems Atomic Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 31
23. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 12210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.023 ↗
24. Edwards · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 384 · 24910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.025 ↗