Shock response of He bubble in single crystal tungsten: molecular dynamics simulation study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations are performed to study the shock response of He bubble with various He-vacancy ratios in single crystal W. Simulation results show that the plastic deformation mode of He bubble is realized by emission of a [100] vacancy type of prismatic dislocation loop, which is formed by reaction of 1/2 type of edge dislocations. He bubble with high He-vacancy ratio is more stable than that with low He-vacancy ratio. Finally, the plastic deformation mode and stability of the He bubble are discussed in term of elasticity theory. It is found that the distribution character of resolved shear stresses on the bubble surface is the underlying cause to control the formation of the vacancy type prismatic dislocation loop; and that the resolved shear stress on the He bubble surface decreases with increase of He-vacancy ratio is the reason why He bubble can be stabilized by increase of its He-vacancy ratio.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Ullmaier · J. Materials Science Forum · 1992 · 97-99 · 45110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.97-99.451 ↗
2. Judge · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 457 · 16510.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.008 ↗
3. Ullmaier · J. Nuclear Fusion · 1984 · 24 · 103910.1088/0029-5515/24/8/009 ↗
4. Charlotte · J. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97
5. Evans · J. Nature · 1981 · 291 · 31010.1038/291310a0 ↗
6. Johnson · J. Nature · 1978 · 276 · 59510.1038/276595a0 ↗
7. Tong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 398 · 4310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.008 ↗
8. Peng · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 99610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.208 ↗
9. Li · Int. J. Plast · 2012 · 32-33 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.007 ↗
10. Kong · J. Nucl. Instrum. Meth B · 2017 · 406 · 64310.1016/j.nimb.2017.02.029 ↗
11. Jia · J. Materials Science Forum · 2019 · 944 · 37810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.944.378 ↗
12. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 30610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.029 ↗
13. Odette · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 31310.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.023 ↗
14. Yamamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329-333 · 99310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.070 ↗
15. Suzudo · J. Nuck. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 69510.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.002 ↗
16. Martinez · Nucl. Fusion. · 2017 · 54
17. Ding · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 411810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00864 ↗
18. Li · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 165 · 11210.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.02.025 ↗
19. Han · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 372510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01015 ↗
20. Glam · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2014 · 1 · 65
21. Glam · Int. J. Fract. · 2010 · 217 · 163
22. Zhou · J. Computational Materials Science. · 2019 · 162 · 25510.1016/j.commatsci.2019.02.019 ↗
23. Wang · J. Radiat. Effff. Defects Solids · 2014 · 169 · 10910.1080/10420150.2013.848449 ↗
24. Li · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116
25. Tobita · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 115110.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.058 ↗
26. Janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
27. Yin · Tungsten · 2019 · 1
28. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313 · 1110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01327-2 ↗
29. Kornelsen · J. Nucl. MAter. · 1980 · 92 · 7910.1016/0022-3115(80)90144-0 ↗
30. Rothaut · Philos. Mag. A · 1983 · 47 · 78110.1080/01418618308245265 ↗
31. Wang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2021 · 547
32. Hamid · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 189
33. Zhan · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 18710.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110076 ↗
34. Cusentino · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 18310.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109875 ↗
35. Pak · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2013 · 88 · 322410.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.09.012 ↗
36. Lee · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2015 · 98–99 · 182510.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.128 ↗
37. Zhu · J. Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2016 · 469 · 12010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.045 ↗
38. Pak · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2017 · 124 · 59110.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.041 ↗
39. Stukowski · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 1
40. Juslin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 6110.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.023 ↗
41. Ackland · Philos. Mag. A · 1987 · 56 · 1510.1080/01418618708204464 ↗
42. Beck · Mol. Phys. · 1968 · 14 · 31110.1080/00268976800100381 ↗
43. Xie · J. Acta Materialia · 2017 · 141 · 1010.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.005 ↗
44. Stukowski · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18
45. Odette · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 8410.1007/s11837-010-0144-1 ↗
46. Kadau · J. Science · 2002 · 1681 · 296
47. Kadau · J. PHYSICAL REVIEW B · 2005 · 7210.1103/PhysRevB.72.064120 ↗
48. Kadau · J. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS · 2007 · 9810.1103/PhysRevLett.98.135701 ↗
49. Sadd · 2005 · 163