journal article·2018-10

Evaluation of Fuel-Clad Chemical Interaction in PFBR MOX test fuel pins

V.V. Jayaraj, S. Thirunavukkarasu, V. Anandaraj, B.K. Ojha, Ran Vijay Kumar, S. Vinodkumar, M. Padalakshmi, C. Padmaprabu, C.N. Venkiteswaran, V. Karthik, R. Divakar, B. Purna Chandra Rao, Jojo Joseph

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fuel Clad Chemical Interaction (FCCI) is one of the life limiting issues in the MOX fuel pins of fast breeder reactors. Clad wastage due to FCCI coupled with stress arising from fission gas pressure and Fuel Clad Mechanical Interaction (FCMI) due to fuel swelling can lead to fuel pin failure. Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques such as Gamma Scanning, Eddy current testing and Neutron Radiography have been successfully used on MOX fuel pins of a test sub-assembly irradiated in Fast Breeder Test Reactor (FBTR) to a burn-up of 112 GW d/t to detect signatures of FCCI. The results obtained by the various NDE techniques have been correlated and verified through metallographic examination on fuel pin cross-sections. The measured clad wastage of 85 μm agrees well with a model developed for MOX fuel with high Pu content. The results of examinations have enabled validation of the model and given confidence to the designer that PFBR MOX fuel can safely attain the target burn-up of 100 GW d/t.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Bradbury · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1978 · 78 · 27210.1016/0022-3115(78)90448-8 ↗
2. K. Maeda. Chapter 3.16 in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, Published by R.J.M. Konings, Elsevier.
3. Carmack · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 473 · 16710.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.02.019 ↗
4. Venkiteswaran · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 449 · 3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.01.045 ↗
5. Vasudeva Rao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 348 · 32910.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.10.004 ↗
6. S.L. Mannan, S.C. Chetal, B. Raj, S.B. Bhoje, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 56(2), 155–178.
7. Baldev · 1997 · 57
8. 2015
9. Jayaraj · 2012 · vol. 2 · 413
10. Jayaraj · 2018 · 181
11. Hilton · 2008
12. Ohse · 1972
13. Strain · 1978
14. 1996
15. Ventre · NDT E Int. · 2011 · 44 · 37610.1016/j.ndteint.2010.10.007 ↗
16. Raghu · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2008 · 989 · 20210.1063/1.2906066 ↗
17. Lawrence · Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. · 1990 · 62 · 256
18. Gueneau · 2015
19. Adamson · 1977
20. Fee · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1981 · 96 · 8010.1016/0022-3115(81)90221-X ↗
21. Lawrence · Nucl. Technol. · 1984 · 64 · 13910.13182/NT84-A33337 ↗
22. Konashi · Nucl. Technol. · 1986 · 72 · 32810.13182/NT86-A33771 ↗
23. Viswanathan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 444 · 10110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.044 ↗