journal article·2011-09

Modeling of yttrium, oxygen atoms and vacancies in γ-iron lattice

Aleksejs Gopejenko, Yuri F. Zhukovskii, Pavel V. Vladimirov, Eugene A. Kotomin, Anton Möslang

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 416· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Development of the oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steels for fission and fusion reactors requires a deep understanding of the mechanism and kinetics of Y 2 O 3 nanoparticle precipitation in the steel matrix. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a large-scale theoretical modeling of the Y 2 O 3 formation. In the current study, a series of first-principles calculations have been performed on different elementary clusters consisting of pair and triple solute atoms and containing: (i) the Y–Fe-vacancy pairs, (ii) the two Y atoms substituted for Fe lattice atoms and (iii) the O impurity atoms dissolved in the steel matrix. The latter is represented by a face-centered cubic γ-Fe single crystal. This structure is relevant because a transition to γ-phase occurs in low Cr ferritic–martensitic steels at typically hot isostatic pressing temperatures. The results clearly demonstrate a certain attraction between the Y substitute and Fe vacancy whereas no binding has been found between the two Y substitute atoms. Results of calculations on different Y–O–Y cluster configurations in lattice show that not only a presence of oxygen atom favors a certain binding between the impurity atoms inside the γ-Fe lattice but also the increased concentration of Fe vacancies is required for the growth of the Y 2 O 3 precipitates within the iron crystalline matrix.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Lindau · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2005 · 75–79 · 98910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.186 ↗
2. Klimiankou · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 17310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.150 ↗
3. Lindau · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 76910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01045-0 ↗
4. Klimiankou · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 34710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.083 ↗
5. Eiselt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 52510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.167 ↗
6. Klimenkov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 55310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.174 ↗
7. Okuda · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1995 · 14 · 160010.1007/BF00455428 ↗
8. Odette · Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
9. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · A353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
10. Gopejenko · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 406 · 34510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.005 ↗
11. Fu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 22550210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.225502 ↗
12. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, VASP the Guide, University of Vienna, 2007. .
13. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 45 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
14. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
15. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
16. Elsässer · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 508110.1088/0953-8984/10/23/012 ↗
17. Swamy · J. Alloys Compd. · 1998 · 269 · 20110.1016/S0925-8388(98)00245-X ↗