journal article·2013-07

Effects of DC substrate bias voltage on dust flux in the Large Helical Device

Kazunori Koga, Katsushi Nishiyama, Yasuhiko Morita, Giichiro Uchida, Daisuke Yamashita, Kunihiro Kamataki, Hyunwoong Seo, Naho Itagaki, Masaharu Shiratani, Naoko Ashikawa, Suguru Masuzaki, Kiyohiko Nishimura, Akio Sagara

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We measured the dependence of the collected flux of dust particles on the bias potential Δ ϕ with respect to ground in the Large Helical Device at the National Institute of Fusion Science. This is a first step toward developing a novel method for removing dust for fusion reactors based on applying a local bias potential. The collected dust particles were classified into two kinds: spherical carbon particles smaller than 300 nm and stainless-steel flakes smaller than 1 μm. For Δ ϕ = −70 to +70 V, the flux of spherical particles increased exponentially with increasing Δ ϕ . The flux of flakes increased when Δ ϕ was increased from −70 V to +30 V and it decreased at higher Δ ϕ . These results suggest that this method is useful for removing carbon and metal dust particles from the shadow area of fusion devices using appropriate control of the local bias potential.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Federici · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 196710.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218 ↗
2. Sharpe · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2002 · 63–64 · 15310.1016/S0920-3796(02)00191-6 ↗
3. Winter · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2004 · 46 · B58310.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/047 ↗
4. Krasheninnikov · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2011 · 53 · 08300110.1088/0741-3335/53/8/083001 ↗
5. Taylor · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2011 · 86 · 61910.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.11.037 ↗
6. Denkevits · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 105910.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.01.009 ↗
7. Krasheninnikov · Phys. Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 314110.1063/1.1724834 ↗
8. Roth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.037 ↗
9. Rosanvallon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 5710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.048 ↗
10. Counsell · Phys. Scripta · 2001 · T91 · 7010.1238/Physica.Topical.091a00070 ↗
11. Wykes · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56–57 · 40310.1016/S0920-3796(01)00578-6 ↗
12. Haasz · Phys. Scripta · 2007 · T128 · 5510.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/011 ↗
13. Shu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 58410.1016/S0022-3115(02)01416-2 ↗
14. Skinner · Phys. Scripta · 2003 · T103 · 3410.1238/Physica.Topical.103a00034 ↗
15. Widdowson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 34110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.030 ↗
16. Bader · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2004 · 75 · 37010.1063/1.1637438 ↗
17. Kurimoto · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 457 · 28510.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.300 ↗
18. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1994 · 65 · 2810.1063/1.113062 ↗
19. Koga · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2009 · 4 · 3410.1585/pfr.4.034 ↗
20. Iwashita · J. Plasma Fusion Res. SERIES · 2009 · 8 · 308
21. Iwashita · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2013 · 88 · 2810.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.10.002 ↗
22. Ohno · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 6110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.051 ↗
23. Tanabe · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · T138 · 01400610.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014006 ↗
24. Robertson · Meter. Sci. Eng. · 2004 · R37 · 129
25. Koga · IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Col. · 2004 · 32 · 40510.1109/TPS.2004.828129 ↗
26. Junge · 1965
27. Bonitz · 2010