Phase-field simulation of the stability of reaction phases at UO2/β-Zr interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The stability of reaction phases at the UO2/Zr (β-Zr) interface in the O–U–Zr system was simulated by a newly constructed multi-phase-field model. At the UO2/Zr (β-Zr) interface, we assumed a liquid phase and an α-Zr (Hcp) phase. The phase growths and atomic diffusions of the constituent elements were simultaneously calculated in one-dimensional simulations. During isothermal aging at 1500 °C and 1600 °C, the thicknesses of both reaction phases increased. As O diffused much faster than U, O concentration increased immediately in the α-Zr (Hcp) phase. On account of its high O concentration, the α-Zr (Hcp) phase rapidly expanded toward the β-Zr (Bcc) side, blocking the diffusion of U from the liquid phase to the β-Zr (Bcc) phase. The stability of the liquid phase was influenced by the U concentration in the liquid phase and was correlated to the growth of the α-Zr (Hcp) phase that was accelerated by the diffusion of O from UO2 to the α-Zr (Hcp) phase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Buesseler · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 993110.1021/es202816c ↗
2. High temperature phase relations in the U–Zr–O system
3. Hofmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1979 · 87 · 37510.1016/0022-3115(79)90575-0 ↗
4. Olander · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 115 · 27110.1016/0022-3115(83)90318-5 ↗
5. Denis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 116 · 4410.1016/0022-3115(83)90290-8 ↗
6. Hofmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1984 · 124 · 8010.1016/0022-3115(84)90013-8 ↗
7. Yamanaka · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 130 · 52410.1016/0022-3115(85)90339-3 ↗
8. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 154 · 10210.1016/0022-3115(88)90123-7 ↗
9. Shiozawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 154 · 11610.1016/0022-3115(88)90124-9 ↗
10. Miyake · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 154 · 12310.1016/0022-3115(88)90125-0 ↗
11. Veshchunov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1990 · 174 · 7210.1016/0022-3115(90)90422-J ↗
12. Hofmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 189 · 4610.1016/0022-3115(92)90418-K ↗
13. Yamanaka · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 247 · 25210.1016/S0022-3115(97)00051-2 ↗
14. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 404 · 12810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.013 ↗
15. Steinbach · Phys. D. · 1999 · 134 · 38510.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
16. Kim · J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 261 · 13510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.09.017 ↗
17. Takaki · Mater. Trans. · 2008 · 49 · 255910.2320/matertrans.MB200805 ↗
18. Steinbach · J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 2007 · 28 · 10110.1007/s11669-006-9009-2 ↗
19. Park · J. Electron. Mater. · 2009 · 38 · 252510.1007/s11664-009-0849-5 ↗
20. Nomura · ISIJ Int. · 2010 · 50 · 192010.2355/isijinternational.50.1920 ↗
21. Hillert · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2001 · 320 · 16110.1016/S0925-8388(00)01481-X ↗
22. Hillert · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1985 · 26110.1007/BF02816052 ↗
23. P. Liang, N. Dupin, S. G. Fries, H. J. Seifert, I. Ansara, H. L. Lukas, F. Aldinger, Z. Metallkd. 92 (2001) 747−756.
24. Guéneau · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 304 · 16110.1016/S0022-3115(02)00878-4 ↗
25. Chevalier · Calphad · 2004 · 28 · 1510.1016/j.calphad.2004.03.005 ↗
26. M. Kurata, Private communication.
27. Loginova · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 132710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00527-X ↗
28. Von · 1975
29. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 223510.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.029 ↗
30. 1993
31. Heo · JOM · 2014 · 66 · 152010.1007/s11837-014-1033-9 ↗
32. Kubo · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1996 · 29 · 25510.1088/0034-4885/29/1/306 ↗
33. Simmons · Scr. Mater. · 2000 · 43 · 93510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00517-0 ↗
34. Simmons · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 365 · 13610.1016/j.msea.2003.09.019 ↗
35. Tsukada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 401 · 15410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.017 ↗