Interaction of face-centered cubic phase and twin in Zr–1.0Sn–1.0Nb–0.3Fe alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermally induced face-centered cubic (FCC) phase and its interactive interface with { 10 1 ¯ 1 } twin in Zr–1.0Sn–1.0Nb–0.3Fe alloy were characterized via transmission electron microscopy. The FCC-Zr phase and the matrix have a B-type orientation relationship, however, the interface deviates from the ( 0001 ) HCP habit plane. Moreover, the FCC-Zr phase and the twin follow Py-type orientation relationship, namely < 1 2 ¯ 10 > HCP / / < 1 1 ¯ 0 > FCC and { 10 1 ¯ 1 } HCP / / { 111 } FCC , which may be attributed to expansion and shuffling adjustment. Although the Py-type orientation relationship between the hexagonal close-packed and the FCC phases in Zr is rarely observed, due to the large crystal plane mismatch, this study provides intuitive evidence of this relationship.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Qiu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 453 · 26910.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.07.017 ↗
2. Zong · Acta Mater · 2019 · 162 · 12610.1016/j.actamat.2018.09.067 ↗
3. Pandey · Acta Mater · 2020 · 196 · 33810.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.015 ↗
4. Aguayo · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 6510.1103/PhysRevB.65.092106 ↗
5. Islam · Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 143 · 42510.1016/j.commatsci.2017.11.032 ↗
6. Hu · Mater. Charact. · 2017 · 129 · 14910.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.037 ↗
7. Zhao · Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 132 · 6310.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.034 ↗
8. Liu · Mater. Lett. · 2020 · 267
9. Yuan · J. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 56 · 263110.1007/s10853-020-05384-x ↗
10. Yuan · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 81 · 23610.1016/j.jmst.2020.10.059 ↗
11. Zhang · Mate. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. · 2021 · 807
12. Tao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2021 · 55110.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152989 ↗
13. Guo · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 137 · 810.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.032 ↗
14. Yuan · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 98 · 4410.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.007 ↗
15. Tao · Mater. Lett. · 2018 · 223 · 23110.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.053 ↗
16. Yang · Mater. Design · 2016 · 104 · 35510.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.047 ↗
17. Yu · Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 140 · 910.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.033 ↗
18. Wei · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 169 · 4610.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.010 ↗
19. Zheng · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 162 · 32610.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.11.037 ↗
20. Zhao · Acta Mater · 2017 · 131 · 27110.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.058 ↗
21. Wei · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 49 · 21110.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.032 ↗
22. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 107310.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.007 ↗
23. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 108510.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.005 ↗
24. Zhang · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2008 · 39 · 107710.1007/s11661-008-9497-2 ↗
25. Liu · Small · 2022 · 18