Transmission electron analysis of dislocation loops in T91 steels from MEGAPIE and MIRE irradiation experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract T91 steel samples were irradiated in both a neutron and a neutron plus proton irradiation environments, and the resulting microstructure was studied using transmission electron microscopy. Three samples were irradiated with neutrons and protons to a cumulative dose of 0.88, 2.07, and 4.35 dpa at temperatures of 254 °C, 260 °C and 320–350 °C, respectively and two samples were irradiated with neutrons to 0.6 and 1 dpa, at a temperature of 290 °C for comparison. Radiation induced dislocation loops were observed in both groups of samples. In all samples irradiated up to 1 dpa, irrespective of irradiation conditions, dislocation loops were segregated near the line dislocations, forming a clear heterogeneous distribution. In the high dose sample, on the other hand, they were uniformly distributed over the grain interior and the middle dose sample showed a mixed character. Voids of similar average size were only observed in the middle and high dose samples, and their appearance seems to be correlated with the onset of homogeneous loop distribution. The observed defect properties are rationalized on the basis of modeling results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Klueh · 2001
2. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater · 2007 · 371 · 3710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.005 ↗
3. Singh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 226 · 27710.1016/0022-3115(95)00121-2 ↗
4. Aït Abderrahim · Nucl. Phys. News · 2010 · 20 · 2410.1080/10506890903178913 ↗
5. Maloy · J. Nucl. Mater · 2001 · 296 · 11910.1016/S0022-3115(01)00514-1 ↗
6. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater · 2003 · 318 · 19210.1016/S0022-3115(03)00100-4 ↗
7. Tong · J. Nucl. Mater · 2010 · 398 · 4310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.008 ↗
8. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater · 2011 · 415 · 30610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.029 ↗
9. Long · J. Nucl. Mater · 2012 · 431 · 8510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.036 ↗
10. Rostocker · 1960
11. Gorse · J. Nucl. Mater · 2011 · 415 · 28410.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.047 ↗
12. Konstantinović · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 468 · 22810.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.038 ↗
13. MEGAPIE, a 1 MW pilot experiment for a liquid metal spallation target10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00561-X ↗
14. Fazio · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2008 · 238 · 147110.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.11.006 ↗
15. Dai · 2014
16. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 468 · 22110.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.026 ↗
17. Note that in previous publications [19] the dose corresponding to the five cycles was erroneously reported to be 1.5 dpa and then this value was transferred by inertia to other publications. 1.0 dpa should be considered as the correct highest dose.
18. Wohlmutter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 431 · 1010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.024 ↗
19. Matijašević · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 157710.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.042 ↗
20. Hirsch · 1977 · 422
21. Eyre · Philos. Mag. · 1965 · 12 · 3110.1080/14786436508224943 ↗
22. Tan · J. Nucl. Mater · 2017 · 493 · 1210.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.05.041 ↗
23. Brimbal · J. Nucl. Mater · 2015 · 465 · 23610.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.045 ↗
24. Weiß · J. Nucl.Mater · 2012 · 426 · 5210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.03.027 ↗
25. Pokor · J. Nucl. Mater · 2004 · 326 · 1910.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.11.007 ↗
26. Jenkins · 2001
27. Nicol · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2001 · 650
28. Souidi · J. Nucl. Mater · 2006 · 355 · 8910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.009 ↗
29. Gamez · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 266610.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.04.040 ↗
30. Bragado · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 97 · 510.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.10.021 ↗
31. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater · 2014 · 452 · 11810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.011 ↗
32. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater · 2015 · 465 · 32610.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.06.012 ↗
33. Domain · J. Nucl. Mater · 2004 · 335 · 12110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.037 ↗
34. Becquart · J. Nucl. Mater · 2010 · 406 · 3910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.019 ↗
35. Fu · Nat. Mater · 2005 · 4 · 6810.1038/nmat1286 ↗
36. Takaki · Radiat. Eff. · 1983 · 79 · 8710.1080/00337578308207398 ↗
37. Vehanen · Phys. Rev. B · 1982 · 25 · 76210.1103/PhysRevB.25.762 ↗
38. Arakawa · Science · 2007 · 318 · 95610.1126/science.1145386 ↗
39. void-swelling in irons and ferritic steels I10.1016/0022-3115(79)90122-3 ↗
40. Domain · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 14411210.1103/PhysRevB.69.144112 ↗
41. Forst · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 17550110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.175501 ↗
42. Terentyev · J. Phys-Condens Mat. · 2012 · 24 · 38
43. Terentyev · J. Nucl. Mater · 2011 · 408 · 27210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.053 ↗
44. Terentyev · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 86 · 910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.04.003 ↗
45. I.M. Bragado, MMonCa. http://www.materials.imdea.org/MMonCa).
46. Bragado · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2013 · 184 · 270310.1016/j.cpc.2013.07.011 ↗
47. Osetsky · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 6110.1080/0141861021000016793 ↗
48. Vrtler · J. Nucl. Mater · 2008 · 382 · 2410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.09.007 ↗
49. Xu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 26550310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.265503 ↗
50. Terentyev · J. Nucl. Mater · 2008 · 382 · 12610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.031 ↗
51. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater · 2007 · 360 · 15910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.10.002 ↗
52. Soneda · Philos. Mag. A · 1998 · 78 · 99510.1080/01418619808239970 ↗
53. Konstantinović · Phys. Status Solidi (A) · 2016 · 213 · 298810.1002/pssa.201600316 ↗
54. Hernández-Mayoral · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 474 · 8810.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.03.002 ↗