Divertor ‘death-ray’ explained: An artifact of a Langmuir probe operating at negative bias in a high-recycling divertor
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The divertor ‘death-ray’, enhanced plasma pressure near the outer strike-point relative to ‘upstream’ values, was thought to correspond to axisymmetric increased divertor heat flux. Recent measurements on Alcator C-Mod show that the ‘death-ray’ is localized to biased Langmuir probes. Heat fluxes deduced from plasma-sheath theory and surface thermocouples agree in sheath-limited and moderate-recycling regimes. They diverge in high-recycling and detached regimes; surface thermocouples measure reduced heat flux while a ‘death-ray’ appears on Langmuir probes. The ‘death-ray’ is caused by the probe’s negative bias affecting the local flux tube. With the bias, electron heat flux to the probe surface is reduced. Thus, the local electron temperature is raised, enhancing neutral ionization and increasing the ion flux to the probe. The plasma fluid code UEDGE is used to simulate and reproduce many of the features of this integrated biased probe/divertor system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. LaBombard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 14910.1016/S0022-3115(97)80037-2 ↗
2. Monk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 39610.1016/S0022-3115(97)80071-2 ↗
3. Stotler · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 94710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00555-8 ↗
4. Marki · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 38210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.197 ↗
5. Herrmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 220–222 · 54310.1016/0022-3115(94)00536-2 ↗
6. Buchenauer · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1995 · 66 · 82710.1063/1.1146236 ↗
7. Asakura · Nucl. Fusion · 1995 · 35 · 38110.1088/0029-5515/35/4/I02 ↗
8. Costanzo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 84010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00647-4 ↗
9. Stangeby · Phys. Fluids · 1984 · 27 · 68210.1063/1.864677 ↗
10. LaBombard · Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 05611610.1063/1.2838246 ↗
11. LaBombard · Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 05611410.1063/1.3566059 ↗
12. Lao · Nucl. Fusion · 1985 · 25 · 161110.1088/0029-5515/25/11/007 ↗
13. Matthews · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1990 · 32 · 130110.1088/0741-3335/32/14/004 ↗
14. Brunner · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 03350110.1063/1.3689770 ↗
15. Stangeby · 2000
16. Elmore · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 06500110.1088/0741-3335/54/6/065001 ↗
17. Storek · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 110.1088/0029-5515/41/1/301 ↗
18. Brunner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S37510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.026 ↗
19. Futch · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196–198 · 86010.1016/S0022-3115(06)80157-1 ↗
20. Hua · Phys. Plasmas · 1994 · 1 · 360710.1063/1.870896 ↗
21. Herrmann · Phys. Scr. · 2004 · 2004 · 9810.1238/Physica.Topical.111a00098 ↗
22. Stangeby · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1995 · 37 · 103110.1088/0741-3335/37/9/008 ↗
23. Jaworski · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2012 · 87 · 171110.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.013 ↗
24. Rudakov · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2004 · 75 · 433410.1063/1.1789623 ↗
25. Rognlien · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196 · 34710.1016/S0022-3115(06)80058-9 ↗
26. Umansky · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2012 · 52 · 41710.1002/ctpp.201210026 ↗