journal article·2013-07

Characterization of fueling NSTX H-mode plasmas diverted to a liquid lithium divertor

R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, T. Abrams, J.P. Allain, M.G. Bell, R.E. Bell, A. Diallo, S.P. Gerhardt, B. Heim, M.A. Jaworski, J. Kallman, S. Kaye, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Maingi, D. Mansfield, A. McLean, J. Menard, D. Mueller, R. Nygren, M. Ono, S.F. Paul, M. Podesta, R. Raman, A.L. Roquemore, S.A. Sabbagh, F. Scotti, C.H. Skinner, V.A. Soukhanovskii, C.N. Taylor, L. Zakharov

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Deuterium fueling experiments were conducted with the NSTX Liquid Lithium Divertor (LLD). Lithium evaporation recoated the LLD surface to approximate flowing liquid Li to sustain D retention. In the first experiment with the diverted outer strike point on the LLD, the difference between the applied D gas input and the plasma D content reached very high values without disrupting the plasma, as would normally occur in the absence of Li pumping, and there was also little change in plasma D content. In the second experiment, constant fueling was applied, as the LLD temperature was varied to change the surface from solid to liquid. The D retention was relatively constant, and about the same as that for solid Li coatings on graphite, or twice that achieved without Li PFC coatings. Contamination of the LLD surface was also possible due to compound formation and erosion and redeposition from carbon PFCs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Kugel · Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 05611810.1063/1.2906260 ↗
2. Taylor · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 05330610.1063/1.3555097 ↗
3. Kugel · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 100010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.262 ↗
4. Kugel · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 112510.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.11.102 ↗
5. Nygren · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 143810.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.11.098 ↗
6. Kugel · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2012 · 84 · 172410.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.07.010 ↗
7. Zweben · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 41710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.106 ↗
8. M. Jaworski et al., in: Proceedings of the 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, October 8–11, 2012.
9. Podesta · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 03300810.1088/0029-5515/52/3/033008 ↗
10. T. Gray, et al., in: Proceedings of the 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, October 8–11, 2012.
11. Soukhanovskii · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2010 · 81 · 10D72310.1063/1.3478749 ↗
12. F. Scotti, et al., in: Proceedings of the 24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, October 8–11, 2012.
13. T. Abrams et al., J. Nucl. Mat. 438 (2013) S313.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.057 ↗
14. Bastaz · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2004 · 72 · 11110.1016/j.fusengdes.2004.07.005 ↗
15. Kocan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S113310.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.08.036 ↗
16. Ziegler · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 1989 · B35 · 215
17. C.H. Skinner et al., J. Nucl. Mat. 438 (2013) S647.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.136 ↗
18. Erents · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1971 · 4 · 67210.1088/0022-3727/4/5/305 ↗