journal article·2015-12Open access

Intermetallic formation and interdiffusion in diffusion couples made of uranium and single crystal iron

Tianyi Chen, Travis A. Smith, Jonathan G. Gigax, Di Chen, Robert Balerio, Lin Shao, Bulent H. Sencer, J. Rory Kennedy

Abstract

Abstract We studied the interfacial phase formation and diffusion kinetics in uranium–iron diffusion couples. A comparison was made between polycrystalline uranium (U) bonded with polycrystalline iron (Fe P ) and polycrystalline uranium bonded with single crystalline Fe (Fe SC ). After thermal annealing at 575 °C, 600 °C, 625 °C and 650 °C, respectively, diffusion and microstructures at the interface were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron miscopy. The presence of grain boundaries in iron has a significant influence on interface reactions. In comparison with U–Fe P system, interdiffusion coefficients of the U–Fe SC system are significantly lower and were governed by much higher activation energies. Integrated interdiffusion coefficients and intrinsic diffusion coefficients were obtained. The intrinsic diffusion coefficients show faster diffusion of iron atoms in both U 6 Fe and UFe 2 intermetallic phases than uranium.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Zegler · 1969
2. Walters · 1964
3. Zegler · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1967 · 13 · 335
4. Kittel · 1949
5. Keiser · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 200 · 22910.1016/0022-3115(93)90334-U ↗
6. Huang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 424 · 8210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.02.004 ↗
7. Wei · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 20510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.027 ↗
8. Shao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 456 · 30210.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.046 ↗
9. Chatain · J. Phase Equilib. · 2003 · 24 · 12210.1361/105497103770330730 ↗
10. Porter · 1992
11. Philiber · Defect Diffusion Forum · 1993 · 95–98 · 49310.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.95-98.493 ↗
12. Edwards · 1969
13. Wagner · Acta Metall. · 1969 · 17 · 9910.1016/0001-6160(69)90131-X ↗
14. Boltzmann · Wiedemanns Ann. Phys. · 1894 · 53 · 95910.1002/andp.18942891315 ↗
15. Matano · Jap. J. Phys. · 1933 · 8 · 109
16. Park · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 456 · 35110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.040 ↗
17. Philibert · Defect Diffusion Forum · 1989 · 66–69 · 995
18. Keblinski · Phil. Mag. A · 1999 · 79 · 273510.1080/01418619908212021 ↗
19. Darken · 1948
20. Smigelskas · Trans. AIME · 1947 · 171 · 130
21. Kodentsov · Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2008 · 33 · 21010.1080/10408430802462958 ↗
22. Mehrer · Mater. Trans. JIM · 1996 · 37 · 125910.2320/matertrans1989.37.1259 ↗
23. Denkinger · Phil. Mag. A · 2000 · 80 · 124510.1080/01418610008212113 ↗
24. Hahn · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 653310.1103/PhysRevB.37.6533 ↗