Dry in-pile fracture test (DRIFT) for separate-effects validation of ceramic fuel fracture models
Source abstract
Abstract
Fracture is an important component of nuclear fuel behavior, and significant efforts have been invested into developing fuel performance models that are capable of accurately representing fracture. Usable data on the process of fracture propagation in nuclear fuel under realistic service conditions are very limited. To address this need, a series of separate-effects experiments were developed and performed at Idaho National Laboratory`s Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility. These experiments employ a heat sink to radially remove heat from the fuel in a manner that approximates the effect of coolant in an operating light-water reactor (LWR). The test holder for these experiments is known as the Dry In-pile Fracture Test (DRIFT). A series of experiments employing DRIFT and TREAT were performed to provide data on the extent and nature of fracture in fresh fuel at various points during a ramp to full power. Novel aspects of these experiments include the way they employ a heat sink to replicate steady-state LWR conditions, as well as the use of fiber optic sensors for in-reactor thermal instrumentation. Details on the development of this experiment, experimental conditions, and resulting data (including in situ thermal measurements and post-irradiation imaging of fracture) are provided in this paper. LWR-equivalent powers ranging from 10 to 25 kW/m were tested using this apparatus. Cracking was visible at all power levels, with increasing cracking extent as the power level increased, although there was little difference in the cracking between the two highest-power tests, which had LWR-equivalent powers of 20 and 25 kW/m.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Cracking and relocation behavior of nuclear fuel pellets during rise to power10.1016/0029-5493(83)90045-6 ↗
2. 3D fuel cracking modelling in pellet cladding mechanical interaction10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.014 ↗
3. Mathematical modeling and analysis of fuel rods10.1016/0029-5493(74)90095-8 ↗
4. Simulating dynamic fracture in oxide fuel pellets using cohesive zone models
5. Discrete element method for simulation of early-life thermal fracturing behavior in ceramic nuclear fuel pellets10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.05.049 ↗
6. Ceramic nuclear fuel fracture modeling with the extended finite element method10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106713 ↗
7. Modelling explicit fracture of nuclear fuel pellets using peridynamics10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.037 ↗
8. Thermomechanical peridynamic analysis with irregular non-uniform domain discretization10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.02.006 ↗
9. Peridynamic investigation on thermal fracturing behavior of ceramic nuclear fuel pellets under power cycles10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.214 ↗
10. Multiphysics phase-field modeling of quasi-static cracking in urania ceramic nuclear fuel10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.191 ↗
11. First report on apparatus to simulate in-reactor transient heating conditions in oxide fuel columns10.13182/NT73-A31347 ↗
12. Temperature profiles in UO2 fuel under direct electric heating conditions10.1016/0022-3115(81)90572-9 ↗
13. Separate-effects validation experiments for models of fracture in ceramic nuclear fuel
14. Separate effects tests for studying temperature-gradient-driven cracking in UO2 pellets10.1080/00295639.2021.1932223 ↗
15. Foreword, special issue on restarting the transient reactor test facility10.1080/00295450.2019.1650604 ↗
16. Nuclear characterization of a general-purpose instrumentation and materials testing location in TREAT10.1016/j.anucene.2018.10.011 ↗
17. Mechanistic verification of empirical UO2 fuel fracture models10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153163 ↗
18. Conductive inserts to reduce nuclear fuel temperature10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151966 ↗
19. Core-to-specimen energy coupling results of the first modern fueled experiments in TREAT10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107117 ↗
20. BISON: a flexible code for advanced simulation of the performance of multiple nuclear fuel forms10.1080/00295450.2020.1836940 ↗
21. A. Marion (NEI) letter dated June 13, 2006 to H. N. Berkow (USNRC/NRR), Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Topical Report TR-1002865, “Topical Report on Reactivity Initiated Accidents: Bases for RIA Fuel rod Failures and Core Coolability Criteria”, 2006, (http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML0616/ML061650107.pdf).
22. Summary Report: Gd Thermal Conductivity Model Updates
23. Material Property Correlations: Comparisons between FRAPCON-4.0, FRAPTRAN-2.0, and MATPRO
24. Multidimensional multiphysics simulation of nuclear fuel behavior10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.012 ↗
25. ESCORE–the EPRI Steady-State Core Reload Evaluator Code: General Description
26. Calibration of a fuel relocation model in BISON
27. SCDAP/RELAP5/ MOD3.1 Code Manual, Volume IV: MATPRO – A Library of Materials Properties for Light-Water-Reactor Accident Analysis
28. Thermal Linear Expansion of Nine Selected AISI Stainless Steels
29. Initial MCNP6 Release Overview-MCNP6 Version 1.0
30. ENDF/b-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002 ↗
31. A Critical Review of the Energy Released in Nuclear Fission
32. MCNP – A General N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5 Volume 1: Overview and Theory
33. B. Spencer J.Schulthess A. Fleming S. Giegel Dry in-pile fracture test (DRIFT) data (Mendeley Data V1) https://doi.org/10.17632/bbjngppf6t.1.
34. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗