journal article·2022-04Open access

Infiltration of porous uranium oxide microspheres prepared by internal gelation

Gamze Colak, Gregory Leinders, Rémi Delville, Frédéric Jutier, Marc Verwerft, Jef Vleugels

Abstract

Process conditions for the fabrication of porous uranium oxide microspheres prepared via internal gelation were assessed. To improve conditions for the application of infiltration, microstructural parameters such as density, porosity and specific surface area were assessed. Specifically, the effect of calcination temperature and the use of pore-formers was studied. Accessible porosity levels around 20% were obtained after calcination at 773 K or 823 K, without the use of a pore-former. As a novel application, starch was used as a low-temperature, burnable pore-former, and its effect was compared to that of graphite. Accessible porosity levels increased to 34% after calcination due to the use of starch, whereas the application of graphite was discarded because it requires too elevated calcination temperatures. A subset of porous uranium oxide microspheres was infiltrated with neodymium nitrate solution as a surrogate for americium nitrate. Very good agreement between targeted and actual Nd content was observed after sintering of the microspheres, and a maximum concentration of y = 25 mol% (U 1-yNd yO 2-x) could be reached.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Magill · Nucl. Energy · 2003 · 263
2. Pillon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 3610.1016/S0022-3115(03)00168-5 ↗
3. Konings · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 282 · 15910.1016/S0022-3115(00)00411-6 ↗
4. Tanaka · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 440 · 48010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.351 ↗
5. Richter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 12110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00232-8 ↗
6. D. Warin, F. Sudreau, S. Pillon, N. Drin, L. Donnet, E. Brunon, "The FUTURIX - transmutation experiment in Phenix", (2004).
7. D'Agata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 46510.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.021 ↗
8. Fernández · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2002 · 85 · 69410.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00152.x ↗
9. Lundberg · Coord Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 318 · 13110.1016/j.ccr.2016.04.003 ↗
10. Delahaye · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 30510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.018 ↗
11. Remy · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 453 · 21410.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.048 ↗
12. Ramond · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2017 · 492 · 9710.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.05.005 ↗
13. S. Picart, et al., "Porous metal oxide microspheres from ion exchange resin", 2015.10.1140/epjst/e2015-02490-y ↗
14. Croixmarie · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 1110.1016/S0022-3115(03)00162-4 ↗
15. 3.11 - Sphere-Pac and VIPAC Fuel
16. Fernandez · J. Alloys Compd. · 1998 · 271 · 61610.1016/S0925-8388(98)00171-6 ↗
17. Couland · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2012 · 95 · 13310.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04854.x ↗
18. Vespa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 421 · 8010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.055 ↗
19. Nästrén · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 433 · 31410.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.037 ↗
20. Boucharat · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2001 · 38 · 25510.1016/S0149-1970(00)00111-6 ↗
21. Nästrén · Nucl. Technol. · 2013 · 181 · 33110.13182/NT13-A15787 ↗
22. Somers · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 88 · 82710.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00175.x ↗
23. Somers · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2006 · 48 · 25910.1016/j.pnucene.2005.09.007 ↗
24. Chan · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2006 · 63 · 17610.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.033 ↗
25. D'Agata · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2014 · 275 · 30010.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.05.021 ↗
26. D'Agata · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2017 · 311 · 13110.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.023 ↗
27. S. Finkeldei, et al., "Synthesis and Characterization of UO2 feedstocks containing controlled dopants, Report No. ORNL/SPR-2019/1067″, (2019).10.2172/1495946 ↗
28. Schreinemachers · Nucl. Eng. Technol. · 2020 · 52 · 101310.1016/j.net.2019.11.004 ↗
29. Collins · Radiochim Acta · 1987 · 42 · 12110.1524/ract.1987.42.3.121 ↗
30. Härtwig · Physica Status Solidi (a) · 1994 · 143 · 2310.1002/pssa.2211430104 ↗
31. Brunauer · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1938 · 60 · 30910.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
32. Rouquerol · Pure Appl. Chem. · 2011 · 84 · 10710.1351/PAC-REP-10-11-19 ↗
33. Zhang · Chem. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 136910.1021/cm011251p ↗
34. Sing · Pure Appl. Chem. · 1985 · 57 · 60310.1351/pac198557040603 ↗
35. Schreinemachers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2020 · 53510.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152128 ↗
36. Lee · Nucl. Technol. · 2016 · 193 · 28710.13182/NT14-136 ↗
37. Wadier · 1973
38. Ohmichi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1981 · 102 · 4010.1016/0022-3115(81)90544-4 ↗
39. Une · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 118 · 18910.1016/0022-3115(83)90224-6 ↗
40. Schreinemachers · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2014 · 72 · 1710.1016/j.pnucene.2013.07.016 ↗
41. Bès · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2018 · 507 · 14510.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.04.046 ↗
42. Leinders · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 459 · 13510.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.01.029 ↗
43. Katalenich · J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 98 · 28810.1007/s10971-021-05479-0 ↗
44. Hunt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2018 · 498 · 26910.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.033 ↗
45. Förthmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1973 · 47 · 25910.1016/0022-3115(73)90110-4 ↗