journal article·2017-05Open access

Spent nuclear fuel/water interface behavior: Alpha dose rate profile determination for model surfaces and microcracks by using Monte-Carlo methods

M. Tribet, S. Mougnaud, C. Jégou

Abstract

Abstract This work aims to better understand the nature and evolution of energy deposits at the UO2/water reactional interface subjected to alpha irradiation, through an original approach based on Monte-Carlo-type simulations, using the MCNPX code. Such an approach has the advantage of describing the energy deposit profiles on both sides of the interface (UO2 and water). The calculations have been performed on simple geometries, with data from an irradiated UOX fuel (burnup of 47 GWd.tHM−1 and 15 years of alpha decay). The influence of geometric parameters such as the diameter and the calculation steps at the reactional interface are discussed, and the exponential laws to be used in practice are suggested. The case of cracks with various different apertures (from 5 to 35 μm) has also been examined and these calculations have also enabled new information on the mean range of radiolytic species in cracks, and thus on the local chemistry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Static dissolution of alpha-doped UO2 in boom clay conditions: preliminary results
2. Effect of alpha irradiation field on long-term corrosion rates of spent fuel
3. Muzeau · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 467 · 57810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.054 ↗
4. Testing of uranium dioxide enriched with U-233 under reducing conditions
5. Eriksen · J. Nucl. Mater · 2012 · 420 · 40910.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.027 ↗
6. Rondinella · Radiochim. Acta · 2000 · 88 · 52710.1524/ract.2000.88.9-11.527 ↗
7. Stroes-Gascoyne · J. Nucl. Mater · 2005 · 346 · 510.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.069 ↗
8. Odorowski · 2015
9. Ollila · J. Nucl. Mater · 2013 · 442 · 32010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.019 ↗
10. Amme · J. Nucl. Mater · 2012 · 430 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.036 ↗
11. Carbol · Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta · 2009 · 73 · 436610.1016/j.gca.2009.04.041 ↗
12. Poulesquen · 2006 · vol. 932 · 505
13. Nielsen · J. Nucl. Mater · 2006 · 359 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.08.001 ↗
14. The MCNPX Monte Carlo radiation transport code
15. X-5_Monte-Carlo_Team MCNP · 2003
16. Brown · 2005
17. Ziegler · 2008
18. Barbié · 2013
19. Sunder · Nucl. Technol. · 1998 · 122 · 21110.13182/NT98-A2863 ↗
20. Spinks · 1990 · p 592
21. Mougnaud · J. Nucl. Mater · 2015 · 462 · 25810.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.04.012 ↗
22. Garisto · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 1989 · 16 · 3310.1016/0306-4549(89)90118-7 ↗
23. Hilbert Christensen · J. Nucl. Mater · 1996 · 238 · 7010.1016/S0022-3115(96)00342-X ↗
24. Liu · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 50 · 1234810.1021/acs.est.6b04167 ↗