journal article·2015-08

Plasma isotopic change over experiments in JET under Carbon and ITER-Like Wall conditions

T. Loarer, S. Brezinsek, V. Philipps, S. Romanelli-Gruenhagen, D. Alves, I. Carvalho, D. Douai, H.G. Esser, R. Felton, D. Frigione, U. Kruezi, C. Reux, R. Smith, M.F. Stamp, S. Vartanian

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Starting with a wall loaded by H 2 , change over experiments from H 2 to D 2 have been carried out in JET-ILW. A series of 13 repetitive pulses (cumulating 215 s in divertor configuration) have been performed under conditions of: I p = 2.0 MA, B T = 2.4 T, 〈 n e 〉 = 4.5 × 10 19 m −3 with a constant gas injection of 3.0 × 10 21 D s −1 and 0.5 MW of auxiliary heating by ICRH in L-mode. Gas balance analysis shows that the total amount of H removed from the wall is in the range of 3 × 10 22 D compared to 2 × 10 23 D for JET-C. This is consistent with the faster decay of the H plasma concentration and the drop of the retention also by a similar factor when removing all the carbon components. Isotopic plasma wall changeover is also demonstrated to allow for removal of some D/T from the device. However, since plasma change over also contributes to long-term retention by codeposition, in ITER, change over in between each discharge might not be effective to reduce the fuel retention on the long-term.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S10810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.017 ↗
2. Brezinsek · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 08302310.1088/0029-5515/53/8/083023 ↗
3. Philipps · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S106710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.234 ↗
4. Tsitrone · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S73510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.132 ↗
5. Hillis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 106110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01538-6 ↗
6. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S80510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.073 ↗
7. Douai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S102110.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.083 ↗
8. T Wauters et al., this conference.
9. Widdowson · Phys. Scripta · 2014 · T159 · 01401010.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014010 ↗
10. Andrew · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1999 · 47 · 23310.1016/S0920-3796(99)00084-8 ↗
11. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 62410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.047 ↗
12. Loarer · Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 03300310.1088/0029-5515/53/3/033003 ↗
13. Bekris · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 65910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.072 ↗
14. de Temermann · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 04200210.1088/0029-5515/49/4/042002 ↗
15. S Brezinsek et al., this conference.