Trapping of He in intrinsic defects in zirconolite
Source abstract
Abstract
Zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7) is a proposed ceramic for the disposal of plutonium. Density functional theory with the dispersion correction (DFT-D3) has been used to study the behaviour of the He defect in zirconolite. The lowest energy He interstitial site is located in the channels and found to have a migration barrier of 1.46 eV. There was a significant charge state dependence on the binding energies of a He atom to the vacancies, with the neutral 5-fold coordinated Ti having the strongest binding followed by the Ca vacancies. Multiple He interstitials were studied to examine if He bubbles were likely to form in bulk zirconolite. It was found that it was unfavourable for He to cluster at the concentrations studied. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. T. Baldwin, N. Chapman and F. Neall, UK National Decommissioning Report, Geologic disposal option for high level nuclear waste and spent fuel, 2008.
2. Reid · Nucl. Instrum. Method Phys. Res. B · 2010 · 268 · 184710.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.026 ↗
3. Ringwood · Nature · 1979 · 278 · 21910.1038/278219a0 ↗
4. Caurant · J. Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 42 · 855810.1007/s10853-007-1810-8 ↗
5. Ruedl · J. Mater. Sci. · 1988 · 23 · 369810.1007/BF00540517 ↗
6. Nix · Acta Metall. · 1977 · 25 · 49510.1016/0001-6160(77)90189-4 ↗
7. Weber · J. Mater. Res. · 1998 · 13 · 143410.1557/JMR.1998.0205 ↗
8. Gilbert · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 416 · 22110.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.089 ↗
9. Matzke · Instrum. Method Phys. Res. B · 1988 · 32 · 45510.1016/0168-583X(88)90256-X ↗
10. Wiss · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 362 · 43110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.096 ↗
11. Mulroue · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 09411810.1103/PhysRevB.84.094118 ↗
12. Pickard · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 04550410.1103/PhysRevLett.97.045504 ↗
13. Pickard · Nat. Phys. · 2007 · 3 · 47310.1038/nphys625 ↗
14. Pickard · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 053201
15. Morris · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 18410210.1103/PhysRevB.78.184102 ↗
16. Morris · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 14411210.1103/PhysRevB.80.144112 ↗
17. Morris · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.84.224106 ↗
18. Rossell · Nature · 1980 · 283 · 28210.1038/283282a0 ↗
19. Vande Vondele · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2005 · 167 · 10310.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
20. Grimmes · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 15410410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
21. National Decommissioning Authority Plutonium Topic Strategy, Credible Options Technical Analysis, SAF/081208/006.2, 2009.
22. Miseki · Chem. Lett. · 2009 · 38 · 18010.1246/cl.2009.180 ↗
23. Saadoune · Chem. Geol. · 2009 · 258 · 18210.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.015 ↗
24. Seletskaia · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 04640310.1103/PhysRevLett.94.046403 ↗
25. Brillant · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 412 · 17010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.054 ↗
26. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 14310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.025 ↗
27. Roudil · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. · 2004 · 82410.1557/PROC-824-CC8.5 ↗
28. Lany · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 84002
29. Clinard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1984 · 126 · 24510.1016/0022-3115(84)90036-9 ↗