journal article·2013-04

Behaviors of full compositional W/Cu functionally gradient materials exposed to the edge plasma of HT-7 tokamak

D.H. Zhu, J.L. Chen, Z.J. Zhou, R. Yan, R. Ding

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 435· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract To investigate the behaviors of graded structure materials under plasma loading, six-layered W/Cu functionally gradient materials (FGMs) with full compositional distributions (from 0% to 100%) were successfully fabricated by resistance sintering under ultra-high pressure (RSUHP) method and were exposed to the edge plasma of the HT-7 tokamak. After about 210 shots plasma loading with an estimated power density in the range of 2–7 MW/m 2 , there is no detaching found at the graded interface corners where the thermal stress concentration is expected and the fatigue failures often occur initially, however, the brittle W layer develops the macroscopic cracks which can extend deeply into the interface and results in the interface failure or even the exfoliated W layer. To avoid these destructions for W/Cu FGMs during wall application, it is necessary to ameliorate the W layer by optimizing the initial powders and sintering parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced materials and composites · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Shimomura · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 46710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.215 ↗
2. janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
3. Luo · Phys. Scr. · 2007 · T128 · 110.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/001 ↗
4. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 93610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.037 ↗
5. Herrmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 74710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.296 ↗
6. Philipps · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.110 ↗
7. Cambi · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 53010.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.02.036 ↗
8. Raffray · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 155310.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.12.069 ↗
9. Park · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 91610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.157 ↗
10. Vieider · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2000 · 49–50 · 13510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00238-6 ↗
11. Pintsuk · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2003 · 66–68 · 23710.1016/S0920-3796(03)00220-5 ↗
12. Itoh · Fus. Eng. Des. · 1996 · 31 · 27910.1016/0920-3796(95)00432-7 ↗
13. Ge · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 121110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.173 ↗
14. Zhou · J. Alloy Compds. · 2007 · 428 · 14610.1016/j.jallcom.2006.03.073 ↗
15. Zhou · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 130910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.184 ↗
16. Gao · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2008 · 83 · 110.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.03.060 ↗
17. Hirai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 6710.1016/S0022-3115(02)01334-X ↗