Ion irradiation induced changes in defects of iron thin films: Electron microscopy and positron annihilation spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Single crystal Fe thin films (∼250 nm) were grown on MgO substrates and irradiated with 2.0 MeV Fe+ ions at 10 and 50 dpa, and the defect evolution was studied using high resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM) and Doppler Broadening Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy (PAS). It was shown that irradiation induced or exacerbated a thin oxide layer at the outer interface and produced substantial Fe/Mg mixing at the film/substrate interface, particularly for the higher dose. Modeling of the PAS data allowed interpretation of the defect types at different distances from the Fe surface, and included several types of MgO substrate damage and annihilation condition changes, indicative of damage due to ballistic effects of the Fe atoms as well as chemical changes due to implantation and subsequent diffusion. This detailed PAS study compared with TEM and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) provides significant insight into depth-dependent defect creation. These results will be useful for predicting defect creation in Fe-based materials under irradiation conditions, for extension to neutron irradiated structural materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Muon and positron interactions and applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Kamada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S86110.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.11.042 ↗
2. Kempf · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 5710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.10.006 ↗
3. Kenik · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2012 · 7310.1016/j.mser.2012.05.002 ↗
4. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 371 · 3710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.005 ↗
5. Baluc · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367 · 3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.036 ↗
6. Yin · J. Supercrit. Fluids · 2009 · 50 · 23510.1016/j.supflu.2009.06.019 ↗
7. Fukuya · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 50 · 21310.1080/00223131.2013.772448 ↗
8. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 12310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00225-1 ↗
9. Odette · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 31310.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.023 ↗
10. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 206 · 26610.1016/0022-3115(93)90128-L ↗
11. Zushi · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2007 · 256 · 43410.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.039 ↗
12. Robertson · Corros. Sci. · 1991 · 32 · 44310.1016/0010-938X(91)90125-9 ↗
13. Borodin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 32510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.007 ↗
14. Phythian · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 205 · 16210.1016/0022-3115(93)90079-E ↗
15. Jin · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 28 · 103910.1016/S1005-0302(12)60170-4 ↗
16. Sencer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283
17. Eldrup · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 34610.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.011 ↗
18. Dobmann · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2001 · 206 · 36310.1016/S0029-5493(00)00422-2 ↗
19. Eldrup · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 91210.1016/S0022-3115(02)01160-1 ↗
20. Lambrecht · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 654710.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.046 ↗
21. Bartošová · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2014 · 273 · 37610.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.01.030 ↗
22. Liu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 451 · 24910.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.008 ↗
23. Krsjak · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 465 · 31110.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.06.015 ↗
24. Parente · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 464 · 14010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.04.033 ↗
25. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 468 · 26010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.011 ↗
26. Nagai · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 22420210.1103/PhysRevB.67.224202 ↗
27. Xu · 2017
28. Cao · 2017
29. Cao · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 395 · 36110.1016/j.jmmm.2015.06.072 ↗
30. Abromeit · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 216 · 7810.1016/0022-3115(94)90008-6 ↗
31. Jin · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2011 · 269 · 20910.1016/j.nimb.2010.12.004 ↗
32. Was · J. Mater. Res. · 2015 · 30 · 115810.1557/jmr.2015.73 ↗
33. Ziegler · 1985
34. Stoller · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2013 · 310 · 7510.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.008 ↗
35. Schultz · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1988 · 60 · 70110.1103/RevModPhys.60.701 ↗
36. Krause-Rehberg · 1999
37. Puska · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1994 · 66 · 84110.1103/RevModPhys.66.841 ↗
38. Lynn · Int. Mater. Rev. · 1991 · 36 · 110.1179/imr.1991.36.1.1 ↗
39. Makkonen · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 22400210.1088/0953-8984/28/22/224002 ↗
40. Tuomisto · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2013 · 85 · 158310.1103/RevModPhys.85.1583 ↗
41. Cao · Appl. Phys. A · 2017 · 123 · 17710.1007/s00339-017-0827-3 ↗
42. Veen · Proc. AIP · 1991 · 218 · 17110.1063/1.40182 ↗
43. He · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2014 · 50510.1088/1742-6596/505/1/012018 ↗
44. Puska · J. Phys. F Met. Phys. · 1982 · 12 · L21110.1088/0305-4608/12/11/002 ↗
45. Zhang · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 105 · 3210.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.019 ↗
46. Ziegler · 1985
47. Henager · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 328510.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.017 ↗
48. Kamada · Mater. Trans. · 2009 · 50 · 213410.2320/matertrans.MAW200907 ↗