Effect of fission generated defects and porosity on thermo-mechanical properties of thorium dioxide
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect of fission product (FP) defects and porosity on thermo-mechanical properties of ThO2 within 300–1500 K has been investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We consider two typical FPs: Xe and Kr (0–2% defect). Our results indicate that these FPs reduce the thermal expansion (α) at low temperature; however, α of the defected system is similar to that of pure ThO2 at the elevated temperature. For porous ThO2 (0–5% porosity), α is within 5% of that of pure system at all studied temperature. The elastic modulus at finite temperature decreases linearly with the increase in the concentration of Xe, Kr and porosity. The degree of reduction (R) in elastic modulus follows the trend R X e > R K r > R P o r o s i t y for all the studied concentration of defects. The MD derived changes in the elastic modulus by FPs and porosities can be well described by the affine functions. We report that the porous ThO2 shows higher reduction in elastic properties than porous UO2. A detail calculation of 0 K properties as a function of defect concentration is presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. http://www.thoriumpowercanada.com/technology/the-fuel/thorium-vs-uranium-fuels/.
2. McMuray · 2014
3. Belle · 1984
4. Mann · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2010 · 10 · 214610.1021/cg901308f ↗
5. Bakker · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 250 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00241-9 ↗
6. Cooper · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 466 · 2910.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.07.022 ↗
7. Cooper · Proc. Roy. Soc. A · 2014 · 470 · 2014042710.1098/rspa.2014.0427 ↗
8. Szpunar · J. Phys. Chem. Solid. · 2016 · 90 · 11410.1016/j.jpcs.2015.10.011 ↗
9. Szpunar · Solid State Sci. · 2014 · 36 · 3510.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2014.07.004 ↗
10. ma · J. Alloy. Comp. · 2015 · 627 · 47610.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.223 ↗
11. Rahman · Mater. Res. Express · 2017 · 4
12. Cooper · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 2014 · 72 · 3310.1016/j.pnucene.2013.09.006 ↗
13. Middleburgh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 427 · 35910.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.03.037 ↗
14. Olander · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.297 ↗
15. Martin · High. Temp. - High. Press. · 1989 · 21 · 13
16. Roque · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 277 · 21110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00192-0 ↗
17. Jelea · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 21010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.006 ↗
18. Cooper · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 10540110.1088/0953-8984/26/10/105401 ↗
19. Qin · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 49540110.1088/0953-8984/26/49/495401 ↗
20. Cooper · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 40540110.1088/0953-8984/28/40/405401 ↗
21. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. http://lammps.sandia.gov/.
23. Hill · Proc. Phys. Soc. · 2002 · 65
24. Voigt · 1928 · 962
25. Reuss · J. Appl. Math. Mech./Z. Angew. Math. Mech. · 1929 · 9 · 49
26. Ravindran · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 489110.1063/1.368733 ↗
27. Mathews · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 280 · 24610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00068-4 ↗
28. Yamashita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 245 · 7210.1016/S0022-3115(96)00750-7 ↗
29. Ohnysty · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1964 · 47 · 39810.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb13840.x ↗
30. Taylor · Br. Ceram. Trans. J. · 1984 · 83 · 32
31. Wang · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 22540410.1088/0953-8984/22/22/225404 ↗
32. Wang · Intermetallics · 2012 · 26 · 5710.1016/j.intermet.2012.02.021 ↗
33. Belle · 1984