Effect of He implantation on fracture behavior and microstructural evolution in F82H
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Reduced-activation ferritic/martensitic steels (RAFMs) are the primary candidate structural materials for fusion reactor blanket components. He bubbles, which formed under 14 MeV neutron irradiation, is considered to cause some mechanical property changes. In a previous study, Hasegawa et al. investigated the fracture behavior using Charpy impact test of He implanted F82H by 50 MeV α-particles with cyclotron accelerator, and the ductile brittle transition temperature (DBTT) was increased and intergranular fracture (IGF) was observed. However, the cause of the IGF was not shown in the previous study. To clarify the cause of the IGF of the He implanted F82H by 50 MeV α-particles with cyclotron accelerator, the microstructure of the He implanted F82H was investigated. After Charpy impact test at 233 K, the brittle fracture surface of the He implanted specimen was observed by SEM and TEM. By SEM observation, grain boundary surface was clearly observed from the bottom of the notch to a depth of about 400 μm. This area correspond to the He implanted region. On the other hand, at unimplanted region, river pattern was observed and transgranular fracture occurred. TEM observation revealed the He bubbles agglomeration at dislocations, lath boundaries, and grain boundaries, and the coarsening of precipitates on grain boundaries. IGF of the He implanted F82H was caused by both He bubbles and coarsening precipitates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Baluc · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367 · 3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.036 ↗
2. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 187 · 4310.1016/0022-3115(92)90317-E ↗
3. Kasada · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258-263 · 119910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00186-X ↗
4. Yabuuchi · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 651710.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.029 ↗
5. Hasegawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 24110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.102 ↗
6. .
7. Tanigawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 4210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.167 ↗
8. Fernández · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 49510.1016/S0022-3115(02)01013-9 ↗
9. Tanigawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367-370 · 13210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.155 ↗
10. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 265 · 20310.1016/S0022-3115(98)00505-4 ↗
11. N. Hashimoto, H. Tanigawa, M. Ando, T. Sawai, K. Shiba, R.L. Klueh, DOE/ER-0313/35 (2003) 41.
12. Tanigawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 28310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.053 ↗
13. Fernández · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 18 · 135310.1179/026708302225007411 ↗
14. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 357 · 16910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.049 ↗
15. Terentyev · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 50 · 92510.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.030 ↗
16. Yamamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 2710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.041 ↗