Thermal fatigue damage of Cu–Cr–Zr alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The primary aim of this investigation is to examine thermal fatigue damage (TFD) in Cu–Cr–Zr alloys used in High Heat Flux components of Tokamak and its subsystems. Thermal fatigue experiments have been carried out between 290 °C and 30 °C, which is analogous to the condition of service application on two Cu–Cr–Zr alloys having different aging treatments. The extents of TFD have been examined by standard measurements of electrical conductivity, lattice strain, residual stress and dynamic elastic modulus, supplemented by characterizations of microstructure and determination of hardness and tensile properties. The results lead to infer that the relative amounts of damage are different in the two alloys which are further dependent on their aging conditions; the reasons for the observed difference have been explained. The operative mechanisms of TFD are revealed to be as formation and subsequent coalescence of microvoids, and/or initiation and growth of microcracks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. ITER Joint Central Team · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 212–215 · 310.1016/0022-3115(94)90027-2 ↗
2. Davis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 212–215 · 135310.1016/0022-3115(94)91050-2 ↗
3. Boutard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 174 · 24010.1016/0022-3115(90)90238-I ↗
4. Butterworth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 189 · 23710.1016/0022-3115(92)90381-T ↗
5. Marmy · Procedia Eng. · 2010 · 2 · 40710.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.045 ↗
6. Morris · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1994 · 188 · 25510.1016/0921-5093(94)90380-8 ↗
7. Holzwarth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 3110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00285-8 ↗
8. Batra · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2002 · 356 · 3210.1016/S0921-5093(02)00852-3 ↗
9. Vinogradov · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 163910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00437-2 ↗
10. Batra · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 299 · 9110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00691-2 ↗
11. Holzwarth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 1910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00278-0 ↗
12. Su · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 392 · 42210.1016/j.msea.2004.09.041 ↗
13. Su · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2007 · 16 · 49010.1007/s11665-007-9071-x ↗
14. Park · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2008 · 83 · 150310.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.07.006 ↗
15. Kalinin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 92010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.256 ↗
16. Wang · J. Alloy Compd. · 2009 · 471 · 17210.1016/j.jallcom.2008.03.054 ↗
17. Wang · J.Alloy Compd. · 2009 · 479 · 30310.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.035 ↗
18. Kwok · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 394 · 5210.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.08.006 ↗
19. Fenici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 212–215 · 39910.1016/0022-3115(94)90093-0 ↗
20. Fabritsiev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 368–388 · 82410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.241 ↗
21. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2004 · 385 · 5910.1016/j.msea.2004.04.025 ↗
22. Birol · J. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 45 · 450110.1007/s10853-010-4542-0 ↗
23. ASTM E112-96, Standard test method for determining average grain size, ASTM, Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004.
24. ASTM E562-11, Standard test method for determining volume fraction by systematic manual point count, ASTM, Pennsylvania, USA, 2011.
25. ASTM E92-82, Standard test method for Vickers hardness of metallic materials, ASTM, PA, USA, 2003.
26. ASTM E8M-04, Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials [Metric], ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004.
27. Huang · Int. J. Plast. · 2010 · 26 · 112410.1016/j.ijplas.2010.01.003 ↗
28. ASTM E1875-08, Standard test method for dynamic Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio by sonic resonance, ASTM, Pennsylvania, USA, 2009.
29. Cullity · 1956
30. Paswan · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2009 · 40 · 264410.1007/s11661-009-9946-6 ↗
31. Rdzawski · Scr. Metall. · 1986 · 20 · 34110.1016/0036-9748(86)90154-7 ↗
32. Knights · Metall. Trans. · 1973 · 4 · 238910.1007/BF02669380 ↗
33. Singh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00184-0 ↗
34. Correira · Acta Mater. · 1997 · 45 · 17710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00142-5 ↗
35. Tang · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 1985 · 1 · 27010.1179/mst.1985.1.4.270 ↗
36. Wang · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 10110.1038/nmat812 ↗
37. Narasaiah · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 392 · 26910.1016/j.msea.2004.09.058 ↗
38. Yang · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 444 · 26010.1016/S0040-6090(03)00810-1 ↗
39. Lin · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2003 · 138 · 2210.1016/S0924-0136(03)00043-8 ↗
40. Davis · 2001
41. Lee · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1989 · 119 · 11310.1016/0921-5093(89)90530-3 ↗
42. Goldsby · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2000 · 279 · 26610.1016/S0921-5093(99)00630-9 ↗
43. Pettersson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 405 · 13110.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.044 ↗
44. Wu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 98410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.055 ↗
45. Henderson · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1998 · 246 · 14310.1016/S0921-5093(97)00750-8 ↗