journal article·2015-11Open access

High temperature deformation mechanism of 15CrODS ferritic steels at cold-rolled and recrystallized conditions

Yoshito Sugino, Shigeharu Ukai, Naoko Oono, Shigenari Hayashi, Takeji Kaito, Satoshi Ohtsuka, Hiroshi Masuda, Satoshi Taniguchi, Eiichi Sato

Abstract

Abstract The ODS ferritic steels realize potentially higher operating temperature due to structural stability by the dispersed nano-size oxide particles. The deformation process and mechanism of 15CrODS ferritic steels were investigated at 1073 K and 1173 K for the cold-rolled and recrystallized conditions. Tensile and creep tests were conducted at the stress in parallel (LD) and perpendicular (TD) directions to the grain boundaries. Strain rate varied from 10 −1 to 10 −9 s −1 . For the LD specimens, deformation in the cold rolled and recrystallized conditions is reinforced by finely dispersed oxide particles. The dominant deformation process for the recrystallized TD specimen is controlled through the grain boundary sliding and stress accommodation via diffusional creep at temperature of 1173 K and lower strain rate less than 10 −4 s −1 . The grain boundary sliding couldn't be rate-controlling process at 1073 K for the as-cold rolled TD specimen, where a dynamic recovery of the dislocation produced by cold-rolling is related to the deformation process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 39 · 87210.1080/18811248.2002.9715271 ↗
2. Sugino · Mater. Trans. · 2012 · 53 · 175310.2320/matertrans.M2012143 ↗
3. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 77310.1016/S0022-3115(02)01046-2 ↗
4. Steckmeyer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 426 · 18210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.03.016 ↗
5. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 182
6. Okada · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1996 · 33 · 93610.1080/18811248.1996.9732035 ↗
7. Alinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 48410.1016/S0022-3115(02)01220-5 ↗
8. Sokolov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 21310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.143 ↗
9. Hayashi · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 140710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.038 ↗
10. Serrano · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 428 · 10310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.08.016 ↗
11. Sugino · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 452 · 62810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.040 ↗
12. Mukherjee · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2002 · 322 · 110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01115-7 ↗
13. Taniguchi · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2013 · 735 · 7910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.735.79 ↗
14. Sherby · Metall. Trans. · 1977 · 8A · 84310.1007/BF02661565 ↗
15. Ruano · J. Mater. Sci. · 1985 · 20 · 373510.1007/BF01113782 ↗
16. Herring · J. Appl. Phys. · 1950 · 21 · 43710.1063/1.1699681 ↗
17. Coble · J. Appl. Phys. · 1963 · 34 · 167910.1063/1.1702656 ↗
18. Rosler · Acta Metall. Mater · 1990 · 38 · 67110.1016/0956-7151(90)90223-4 ↗
19. Leng · ISIJ Int. · 2012 · 51 · 95110.2355/isijinternational.51.951 ↗