journal article·2019-04

Reconstructing the austenite parent microstructure of martensitic steels: A case study for reduced-activation Eurofer steels

D.R. Almeida Junior, K.D. Zilnyk, D. Raabe, H.R.Z. Sandim

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A computer program was employed to reconstruct the parent microstructure from electron backscatter diffraction maps taken from martensite. The reconstruction is based on a given user-selected orientation relationship. Two reduced-activation ferritic-martensitic Eurofer steels were austenitized for several times and cooled down at different rates. Two parameters are proposed to assess the quality of the reconstruction: the relative frequency of orientations in a determined sub-portion of the Euler space and the distribution of the angular deviation from a given theoretical orientation relationship. The number of active martensitic orientation variants during the transformation depends on grain size. Coarser grains enable a greater number of active variants improving the reconstruction quality. The distributions of angular deviations reveal that the Greninger-Troiano orientation relationship is the one that best describes the martensitic transformation in both steel grades.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Murty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 383 · 18910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
2. Zinkle · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 73510.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
3. Knaster · Nat. Phys. · 2016 · 12 · 42410.1038/nphys3735 ↗
4. Zilnyk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 462 · 36010.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.112 ↗
5. Humbert · Scripta Metall. Mater. · 1994 · 30 · 37710.1016/0956-716X(94)90392-1 ↗
6. Tomida · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 146 · 2510.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.033 ↗
7. M. Humbert, F. Wagner, C. Esling, (1992) 724–730..10.1107/S0021889892005375 ↗
8. Cayron · Acta Crystallogr. A · 2006 · 62 · 2110.1107/S010876730503686X ↗
9. Payton · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 104510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.042 ↗
10. Cayron · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2007 · 40 · 118310.1107/S0021889807048777 ↗
11. Miyamoto · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 639310.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.001 ↗
12. Krishna · Scripta Mater. · 2010 · 62 · 39110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.031 ↗
13. Germain · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 455110.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.034 ↗
14. Abbasi · Mater. Char. · 2014 · 95 · 21910.1016/j.matchar.2014.06.023 ↗
15. Gomes · IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2015 · 8210.1088/1757-899X/82/1/012059 ↗
16. Hadke · Phil. Mag. Lett. · 2016 · 96 · 17510.1080/09500839.2016.1180436 ↗
17. Nyyssönen · Metall. Mater. Trans. Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 47 · 258710.1007/s11661-016-3462-2 ↗
18. Cayron · Mater. Char. · 2006 · 57 · 38610.1016/j.matchar.2006.03.008 ↗
19. Germain · Scripta Mater. · 2019 · 158 · 9110.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.08.042 ↗
20. Pham · Mater. Char. · 2017 · 132 · 10810.1016/j.matchar.2017.08.007 ↗
21. Sanz · Metall. Mater. Trans. · 2017 · 48 · 525810.1007/s11661-017-4289-1 ↗
22. Crystallography of austenite decomposition
23. Over the mechanisms of steel hardening
24. Mechanism of transformation from face-centred to body- centred cubic lattice
25. Einfluss der α-γ-Umwandlung eines irreversiblen Nickelstahls auf Kristallorientierung und Zugfestigkeit
26. Germain · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 112910.1016/j.ultramic.2007.01.012 ↗
27. Sato · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 193110.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.035 ↗
28. Miyamoto · Scripta Mater. · 2009 · 60 · 111310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.053 ↗
29. Zilnyk · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 143 · 22710.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.026 ↗
30. Bunge · 2015
31. Nolze · Cryst. Res. Technol. · 2015 · 50 · 18810.1002/crat.201400427 ↗
32. Grimmer · Acta Crystallogr. A · 1980 · 36 · 38210.1107/S0567739480000861 ↗
33. Huynh · J. Math. Imag. Vis. · 2009 · 35 · 15510.1007/s10851-009-0161-2 ↗
34. Lindau · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 58–59 · 78110.1016/S0920-3796(01)00562-2 ↗
35. Lindau · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2005 · 75–79 · 98910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.186 ↗
36. Oliveira · J. Phase Equilibria Diffusion · 2017 · 38 · 20810.1007/s11669-017-0530-2 ↗
37. Raju · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 405 · 5910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.036 ↗
38. Danon · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2003 · 348 · 12210.1016/S0921-5093(02)00632-9 ↗
39. Zavaleta Gutiérrez · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 29 · 125410.1179/1743284713Y.0000000271 ↗
40. Kirana · Steel Res. Int. · 2015 · 86 · 82510.1002/srin.201400183 ↗
41. Oliveira · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2017 · 485 · 2310.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.019 ↗
42. Kirana · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 31 · 44810.1179/1743284714Y.0000000627 ↗
43. Zilnyk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2017 · 492 · 14210.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.05.027 ↗
44. Sandim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2017 · 484 · 28310.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.025 ↗
45. Field · Ultramicroscopy · 1997 · 67 · 110.1016/S0304-3991(96)00104-0 ↗
46. Wright · Ultramicroscopy · 2015 · 159 · 8110.1016/j.ultramic.2015.08.001 ↗
47. Wilkinson · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 36610.1016/S1369-7021(12)70163-3 ↗
48. Lu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 44510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.152 ↗
49. Barcelo · Phase Transitions · 2010 · 83 · 60110.1080/01411594.2010.502054 ↗
50. Yang · Mater. Res. · 2015 · 18 · 1010.1590/1516-1439.320114 ↗
51. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 144 · 60110.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.003 ↗