journal article·2016-05

Thermal cycling effect in U-10Mo/Zry-4 monolithic nuclear fuel

Denise A. Lopes, Angelo J.O. Zimmermann, Selma L. Silva, J.R.C. Piqueira

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Uranium alloys in a monolithic form have been considered attractive candidates for high density nuclear fuel. However, this high-density fissile material configuration keeps the volume permitted for the retention of fission products at a minimum. Additionally, the monolithic nuclear fuel has a peculiar configuration, whereby the fuel is in direct contact with the cladding. How this fuel configuration will retain fission products and how this will affect its integrity under various physical conditions - such as thermal cycling - are some of the technological problems for this new fuel. In this paper, the effect of out-of-pile thermal cycling is studied for a monolithic fuel plate produced by a hot co-rolling method using U-10Mo (wt %) as the fuel alloy and Zircaloy-4 as the cladding material. After performing 10 thermal cycles from 25 to 400 °C at a rate of 1 °C/min (∼125 h), the fuel alloy presented several fractures that were observed to occur in the last three cycles. These cracks nucleated approximately in the center of the fuel alloy and crossed the interdiffusion zone initiating an internal crack in the cladding. The results suggest that the origin of these fractures is the thermal fatigue of the U-10Mo alloy caused due to the combination of two factors: (i) the high difference in the thermal expansion coefficient of the fuel and of the cladding material, and (ii) the bound condition of fuel/cladding materials in this fuel element configuration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Snelgrove · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1997 · 178 · 11910.1016/S0029-5493(97)00217-3 ↗
2. Meyer · Nucl. Eng. Technol. · 2014 · 46 · 16910.5516/NET.07.2014.706 ↗
3. Savchenko · Energy Convers. Manage · 2010 · 51 · 182610.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.027 ↗
4. 2003
5. Wachs · 2007
6. Jue · Nucl. Eng. Technol. · 2010 · 72 · 20410.13182/NT10-A10905 ↗
7. Jue · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 448 · 25010.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.02.004 ↗
8. Crawford · Mater · 2007 · 371 · 202
9. Perez · J. Nucl. Mater · 2010 · 402 · 810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.016 ↗
10. Olander · 1976
11. Meyer · J. Nucl. Mater · 2001 · 299 · 17510.1016/S0022-3115(01)00676-6 ↗
12. Irradiation testing of monolithic fuel at argonne and idaho national laboratories
13. Holden · 1958
14. Wilkinson · 1962 · vol. 2
15. Hills · J. Less Common Met. · 1963 · 5 · 36910.1016/0022-5088(63)90050-X ↗
16. Saller · 1954
17. Zirconium alloys in nuclear applications
18. Sheldon · 1989 · vol. 10 · 165
19. Post-irradiation analysis of U-Mo miniplates tested to date
20. Perez · 2011
21. 2010
22. Burkes · J. Nucl. Mater · 2010 · 403 · 16010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.018 ↗
23. Moore · 2010
24. 2004
25. Burkes · 2010
26. 1980