journal article·2018-02

Thermal shock behavior of W–ZrC/Sc2O3 composites under two different transient events by electron and laser irradiation

Hong-Yu Chen, Lai-Ma Luo, Xiang Zan, Qiu Xu, Kazutoshi Tokunaga, Jia-Qin Liu, Xiao-Yong Zhu, Ji-Gui Cheng, Yu-Cheng Wu

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The transient thermal shock behaviors of W–ZrC/Sc 2 O 3 composites with different ZrC contents were evaluated using transient thermal shock test by electron and laser beams. The effects of different ZrC doping contents on the surface morphology and thermal shock resistance of W–ZrC/Sc 2 O 3 composites were then investigated. Similarity and difference between effects of electron and laser beam transient heat loading were also discussed in this study. Repeated heat loading resulted in thermal fatigue of the irradiated W–ZrC/Sc 2 O 3 samples by thermal stress, leading to the rough surface morphologies with cracks. After different transient thermal tests, significant surface roughening, cracks, surface melting, and droplet ejection occurred. W–2vol.%Sc 2 O 3 sample has superior thermal properties and greater resistance to surface modifications under transient thermal shock, and with the increasing ZrC content in W alloys, thermal shock resistance of W–Zr/Sc 2 O 3 sample tends to be unsatisfied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Battabyal · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 538 · 5310.1016/j.msea.2012.01.011 ↗
2. Kurishita · Phys. Scr. · 2007 · T128 · 7610.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/015 ↗
3. Miyamoto · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 06503510.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065035 ↗
4. Tokar · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 01301310.1088/0029-5515/52/1/013013 ↗
5. Ferroni · Acta Mater · 2015 · 90 · 38010.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.067 ↗
6. Yang · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 92 · 17810.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.004 ↗
7. El-Atwani · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 471610.1038/srep04716 ↗
8. Xu · Acta Mater · 2015 · 87 · 12110.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.049 ↗
9. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater · 2013 · 442 · S29710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.094 ↗
10. Zhao · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 479 · 61610.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.07.049 ↗
11. Zhao · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 470 · 23610.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.042 ↗
12. Huang · Int. J. Refract. Met. H. · 2015 · 51 · 1910.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.02.001 ↗
13. Suslova · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 684510.1038/srep06845 ↗
14. Xie · J. Nucl. Mater · 2016 · 469 · 20910.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.10.052 ↗
15. Wirtz · J. Nucl. Mater · 2013 · 443 · 49710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.08.002 ↗
16. Temmerman · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 19810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.075 ↗
17. Mabuchi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1996 · 214 · 17410.1016/0921-5093(96)10377-4 ↗
18. Mabuchi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1997 · 237 · 24110.1016/S0921-5093(97)00420-6 ↗
19. Kitsunai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · S271–272 · 42310.1016/S0022-3115(98)00753-3 ↗
20. Ryu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 363 · 17910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00641-5 ↗
21. Xia · J. Nucl. Mater · 2012 · 430 · 21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.009 ↗
22. Luo · Powder Technol. · 2015 · 273 · 810.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.033 ↗
23. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater · 2015 · 462 · 49610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.120 ↗
24. Yar · J. Nucl. Mater · 2011 · 408 · 12910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.060 ↗
25. H.Y. Chen, L.M. Luo, J.B. Chen, et al., Sci. Rep.. 6:32678.
26. Barin, I, Wiley-VCH, Verlag. GmbH. Weinheim, (1995).
27. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater · 2013 · 438 · S90510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.196 ↗
28. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 212–215 · 132310.1016/0022-3115(94)91044-8 ↗
29. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 99810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00316-X ↗
30. Zhou · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 11510.1016/j.fusengdes.2009.08.003 ↗
31. Tan · Nucl. Mater. Energy · 2016 · 000 · 1
32. Shi · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2016 · 113 · 9210.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.11.005 ↗