Effects of tensile stress on Cu clustering in irradiated Fe–Cu alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Effects of tensile stress on Cu clustering were explained using atom probe tomography (APT) results of Fe–0.6 wt.%Cu alloy specimens irradiated with 6.4 MeV Fe ions while applying a tensile stress of 60 MPa at room temperature (less than 50 °C) and 290 °C. The hardening under the tensile-stressed irradiation was smaller than that under the stress-free irradiation at both room temperature and 290 °C. APT results showed that well-defined Cu clusters were formed in all specimens even under the room temperature irradiation. The Cu clusters under the tensile-stressed condition were smaller and had higher densities than those under the stress-free condition. The lower Cu content in clusters and more diffuse Cu clustering were obtained for the specimens irradiated under the tensile-stressed condition. The hardening efficiency of Cu clusters was correlated with the Cu content in clusters and the coherency of interface between a cluster and the matrix. Application of tensile stress would control hardening by changing the nature of Cu clusters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Fisher · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A · 1985 · 315 · 30110.1098/rsta.1985.0042 ↗
2. Odette · Rad. Eff. Def. Solids · 1998 · 144 · 18910.1080/10420159808229676 ↗
3. Nagai · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 13411010.1103/PhysRevB.63.134110 ↗
4. Tobita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 299 · 26710.1016/S0022-3115(01)00694-8 ↗
5. Ishino · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 35410.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.012 ↗
6. Radiguet · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 360 · 10410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.007 ↗
7. Hernández-Mayoral · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 399 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.013 ↗
8. Fujii · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 15110.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.055 ↗
9. Odette · Rad. Eff. Def. Solids · 1998 · 144 · 18910.1080/10420159808229676 ↗
10. Pareige · Nucl. Instr. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2001 · 178 · 23310.1016/S0168-583X(00)00467-5 ↗
11. J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Biersak, SRIM 2006, .
12. Oliver · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
13. Pharr · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 40 · 27110.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
14. Chen · Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 69310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.043 ↗
15. Russell · Acta Met. · 1972 · 20 · 96910.1016/0001-6160(72)90091-0 ↗
16. Tsuru · J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn. · 2010 · 59 · 58310.2472/jsms.59.583 ↗
17. A. Nomoto, N. Naoki, A. Takahashi, S. Ishino, CRIEPI Research Report, Q04019, August 2005.
18. Miyashiro · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.056 ↗
19. Heald · Philos. Mag. · 1974 · 29 · 107510.1080/14786437408226592 ↗
20. Wolfer · Nucl. Technol. · 1972 · 16 · 5510.13182/NT72-A31175 ↗
21. Sato · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 350 · 22010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00692-5 ↗
22. Sato · Rad. Eff. Def. Solids · 2002 · 157 · 17110.1080/10420150211403 ↗