Thermal conductivity of non-stoichiometric americium oxide: A molecular dynamics study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of multi-valency of americium in its oxide for the lowering of the thermal conductivity and the uncertainty in measurement. In the present study, thermal conductivity of non-stoichiometric americium oxide was evaluated up to 2000 K by the non-equilibrium molecular dynamics calculations using the Born–Mayer–Huggins interatomic potential with the partially ionic model. The oxygen-to-americium ratio (O/Am) was varied from 1.6 to 1.9, which corresponded to the variation of the ratio of Am 3+ /Am 4+ . So, we prepared potential parameters for both Am 3+ and Am 4+ . The calculated thermal conductivity of non-stoichiometric americium oxide decreased with an increase of temperature, and the degree of the temperature dependence became smaller with a decrease of the O/Am ratio. This was mainly caused by the phonon-scattering due to oxygen vacancies induced with Am 3+ ions. Comparing two supercells in which (1) short-range ordered Am 3+ clusters were contained and (2) Am 3+ ions were randomly distributed, the thermal conductivity of the former seemed to be somewhat larger than that of the latter.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Cordfunke · 1990
2. Fahey · Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. · 1974 · 20 · 45910.1016/0020-1650(74)80067-X ↗
3. Nishi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 373 · 29510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.06.007 ↗
4. Minato · Recent Adv. Actinide Sci. · 2006 · 31710.1039/BK9780854046782-00317 ↗
5. Dancausse · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 3 · 13610.1080/00223131.2002.10875427 ↗
6. Li · High Press. Res. · 2002 · 22 · 47110.1080/08957950212818 ↗
7. Idiri · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 1411310.1103/PhysRevB.70.014113 ↗
8. H.E. Schmidt, in: Proc. 4ième Journées d’Actinides, Harwell, UK, 1974, Atomic Energy Research Establishment Report AERE-R-7961, 1975.
9. Bakker · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 254 · 12910.1016/S0022-3115(97)00354-1 ↗
10. Lemehov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 6610.1016/S0022-3115(03)00172-7 ↗
11. Kurosaki · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 41 · 82710.3327/jnst.41.827 ↗
12. Arima · J. Alloys Compd. · 2005 · 400 · 4310.1016/j.jallcom.2005.04.003 ↗
13. Arima · J. Alloys Compd. · 2006 · 415 · 4310.1016/j.jallcom.2005.08.003 ↗
14. Arima · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 376 · 13910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.067 ↗
15. Uchida · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 45 · 22910.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.012 ↗
16. Hirao · 1994
17. Inaba · Solid State Ionics · 1999 · 122 · 9510.1016/S0167-2738(99)00036-3 ↗
18. Hayashi · Solid State Ionics · 2000 · 131 · 28110.1016/S0167-2738(00)00675-5 ↗
19. Thiriet · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 320 · 29210.1016/S0022-3115(03)00188-0 ↗
20. Taylor · Br. Ceram. Trans. J. · 1984 · 83 · 92
21. Shannon · Acta Crystallogr. · 1976 · A32 · 75110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
22. Evans · 1990
23. Motoyama · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 29210.1103/PhysRevB.60.292 ↗
24. Bernu · Phys. Rev. A · 1978 · 18 · 234510.1103/PhysRevA.18.2345 ↗
25. Chikalla · J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. · 1968 · 30 · 13310.1016/0022-1902(68)80072-7 ↗
26. Fukushima · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 115 · 11810.1016/0022-3115(83)90350-1 ↗