journal article·2013-01

The metallurgy, mechanics, modelling and assessment of dissimilar material brazed joints

Niall Robert Hamilton, James Wood, Alexander Galloway, Mikael Brian Olsson Robbie, Yuxuan Zhang

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 432· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

At the heart of any procedure for modelling and assessing the design or failure of dissimilar material brazed joints there must be a basic understanding of the metallurgy and mechanics of the joint. This paper is about developing this understanding and addressing the issues faced with modelling and predicting failure in real dissimilar material brazed joints and the challenges still to be overcome in many cases. An understanding of the key metallurgical features of such joints in relation to finite element modelling is presented in addition to a study of the mechanics and stress state at an abrupt interface between two materials. A discussion is also presented on why elastic singularities do not exist based on a consideration of the assumption of an abrupt change in material properties and plasticity in the vicinity of the joint. In terms of modelling real dissimilar material brazed joints; there are several barriers to accurately capturing the stress state in the region of the joint and across the brazed layer and these are discussed in relation to a metallurgical study of a real dissimilar material brazed joint. However, this does not preclude using a simplified modelling approach with a representative braze layer in design and failure assessment away from the interface. In addition modelling strategies and techniques for assessing the various failure mechanisms of dissimilar material brazed joints are discussed. The findings from this paper are applicable to dissimilar material brazed joints found in a range of applications; however the references listed are primarily focused on work in fusion research and development.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. ITER Materials Assessment Report (MAR), ITER Doc. G 74 MA 10 W 0.3, 2001.
2. ITER Materials Properties Handbook (MPH), ITER Doc. G 74 MA 10 W 0.3, 2001.
3. Linke · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 49 · 45510.13182/FST06-A1144 ↗
4. Rödig · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1998 · 39–40 · 55110.1016/S0920-3796(98)00131-8 ↗
5. Suzuki · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 49–50 · 34310.1016/S0920-3796(00)00394-X ↗
6. Norajitra · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 81310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.233 ↗
7. AWS Brazing Handbook, fourth ed., American Welding Society, Miami, 1991.
8. Bao · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 539710.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.002 ↗
9. You · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 70210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.188 ↗
10. Williamson · Compute. Eng. · 1995 · 5 · 85110.1016/0961-9526(95)00035-L ↗
11. Hamlyn-Harris · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2009 · 84 · 88710.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.12.124 ↗
12. Dadras · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 230 · 16410.1016/0022-3115(96)00021-9 ↗
13. You · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1998 · 38 · 30710.1016/S0920-3796(97)00118-X ↗
14. Chehtov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 122810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.224 ↗
15. Galli · J. Eng. Mater. Technol. · 2009 · 131 · 021004-110.1115/1.3078305 ↗
16. Gong · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2009 · 209 · 163510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.014 ↗
17. P. Bastid, P. Jackson, Predicting Successful Manufacture of Ceramic/Metal Joints Using Weibull Modelling, TWI Technology Briefing, 2006, p. 852.
18. Hamilton · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2011 · 86 · 164210.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.04.027 ↗
19. Munz · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 13 · 45310.1016/0955-2219(94)90024-8 ↗
20. Kelly · J. Strain Anal. · 1992 · 27 · 1510.1243/03093247V271015 ↗
21. You · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 299 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00680-8 ↗
22. Erdogan · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2000 · 37 · 17110.1016/S0020-7683(99)00086-4 ↗
23. Orowan · Rep. Prog. Phys. XII · 1948 · 185
24. Singh · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 31 · 130910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.022 ↗
25. Yang · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1997 · 56 · 69110.1016/S0013-7944(96)00121-X ↗
26. Shiota · 1997
27. Vieira · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 1999 · 92–93 · 15610.1016/S0924-0136(99)00235-6 ↗
28. Yun-Han · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 303 · 18810.1016/S0022-3115(02)00801-2 ↗
29. Yan · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 154210.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.039 ↗
30. B.E. Blackwell, A Framework for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Material Joints, MIT PhD Thesis, 1992, pp. 122.
31. Xu · Soc. Exp. Mech. · 2004 · 44 · 60810.1007/BF02428250 ↗
32. Baladi · Eng. Technol. · 2011 · 79 · 47
33. Vaidya · Acta Mater. · 1998 · 46 · 204710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00429-1 ↗
34. Kalin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 154410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.170 ↗
35. F. Brossa, et al., Experimental tests concerning the use of the tungsten–copper couple design concept on the divertor system, in: Proceedings of 12th Symposium on Fusion Technology, Jülich (FRG), September 1982, pp. 491–496.10.1016/B978-1-4832-8374-6.50070-8 ↗
36. Cao · Mech. Mater. · 1989 · 7 · 29510.1016/0167-6636(89)90020-3 ↗
37. Rice · J. Appl. Mech. · 1988 · 110 · 9810.1115/1.3173668 ↗
38. Xu · Int. J. Fract. · 1996 · 74 · 28910.1007/BF00035845 ↗
39. Jousset · NAFEMS – FEM Idealisation of Joints · 2010 · 93
40. Suo · Int. J. Fract. · 1990 · 43 · 110.1007/BF00018123 ↗
41. Hutchinson · Adv. Appl. Mech. · 1992 · 29 · 6310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
42. Charalambides · J. Appl. Mech. · 1989 · 56 · 7710.1115/1.3176069 ↗
43. Dauskardt · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1998 · 61 · 14110.1016/S0013-7944(98)00052-6 ↗
44. E. Niemi, W Fricke, S. Maddox, Fatigue Analysis of Welded Components: Designer’s Guide to the Structural Hot-Spot Stress Approach, Woodhead Pub., 2006.10.1201/9781439824016 ↗
45. S. Maddox, Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures, Woodhead Pub., 1991.
46. I. Poutiainen et al, Determination of the Structural Hot Spot Stress Using Finite Element Method – A Comparison of Current Procedures, IIW Report XIII 1991, p. 03.
47. W. Fricke et al., Determination of Hot Spot Stress In Structural Members with In-plane Notches Using a Coarse Element Mesh, IIW Report XIII 1870, p. 01.
48. Simulia, Modelling Fracture and Failure with Abaqus, Coursenotes, 2010.
49. Needleman · J. Appl. Mech. · 1987 · 54 · 52510.1115/1.3173064 ↗
50. Dugdale · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1960 · 8 · 10010.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
51. Needleman · 199210.1007/978-1-4612-2934-6_4 ↗
52. Nguyen · Int. J. Fract. · 2001 · 110 · 35110.1023/A:1010839522926 ↗
53. ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, 2007.