journal article·2011-08

Post-disruption outgassing in Tore Supra

B. Pégourié, H. Wang, C. Brosset, J. Bucalossi, Y. Corre, T. Dittmar, D. Douai, A. Ekedahl, T. Loarer, C. Reux, F. Saint-Laurent, E. Tsitrone, S. Vartanian

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 415· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Disruptive plasma termination was proposed for controlling long-term fuel retention because the subsequent increase of the post-discharge outgassing could help in minimizing the fuel stored in the vessel after each discharge. The efficiency of this method is investigated by analyzing the Tore Supra database for the period 2004–2010 (450 disruptions). Results are shown for the plasma motion during the current quench and the heating of deposits at the Toroidal Pumped Limiter surface. Dependences of the outgassing with internal and magnetic energy contents, increment of the wall inventory and cumulated time between two disruptions are characterized. It is shown: (1) that the desorbed gas originates from D-rich deposits close to the plasma when those located in remote areas are weakly affected and (2) that the amount of released gas saturates with discharge duration and time delay between two disruptions, which limits the efficiency of the method for long discharge operation. However, due to the larger volume/surface ratio, the efficiency of the method is expected to increase with the size of the device.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. ITER Physics Basis · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47
2. Counsell · Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2006 · 48 · B18910.1088/0741-3335/48/12B/S18 ↗
3. Dylla · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1987 · 145 · 4810.1016/0022-3115(87)90309-6 ↗
4. Whyte · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 56010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.134 ↗
5. Ogiwara · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1990 · 176–177 · 79210.1016/0022-3115(90)90145-D ↗
6. Philipps · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 47810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.049 ↗
7. Lipschultz · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 04500910.1088/0029-5515/49/4/045009 ↗
8. Hollmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 59710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.124 ↗
9. J. Bucalossi et al., Assessment of Massive Gas Injection as a Disruption Mitigation Tool in Tore Supra, this proceedings.
10. Guilhem · QIRT J. · 2005 · 2 · 7710.3166/qirt.2.77-96 ↗
11. Azéroual · Nucl. Fusion · 2000 · 40 · 165110.1088/0029-5515/40/9/309 ↗
12. Bucalossi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 75910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.071 ↗
13. Pégourié · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 55010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.095 ↗
14. Pégourié · Phys. Scr. · 2004 · T111 · 2310.1238/Physica.Topical.111a00023 ↗
15. Pégourié · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 56 · 133410.13182/FST09-A9181 ↗
16. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 62410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.047 ↗
17. Kirschner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 9110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.002 ↗
18. E. Tsitrone et al., Multi Machine Scaling of Fuel Retention in Carbon Dominated Tokamaks, this proceedings.