The microstructure and thermodynamic behavior of as-cast U-24Pu-15Zr: Unexpected results and recommendations for U-Pu-Zr fuel research methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Minor actinide transmutation fuels, of which U-Pu-Zr is one of the most promising, have been the subject of renewed interest for fast reactor applications. Unfortunately, we lack the understanding necessary to make quantitative, mechanistic predictions about the complex phase behaviors exhibited by U-Pu-Zr. This prevents the efficient development and implementation of U-Pu-Zr fuels. Herein, we use state of the art experimental and mesoscale simulation techniques to examine and predict the behavior of U-24Pu-15Zr (weight percent). Experimental and simulated microstructural and phase stability results are compared to one another and to accepted reference data. Experiments revealed a heterogeneous microstructure composed of α Z r , ZrO2, δ, β P u , and ζ at room temperature. The unexpectedly high ratio of β P u to ζ is believed to arise from non-equilibrium and surface effects, as both passivation and Pu and Zr segregation were observed in the samples. A modeling technique based on the overall bulk free energy is devised to estimate the extent of a microstructure's departure from equilibrium. Agreement between the datasets is used to justify a set of recommendations for the further study of U-Pu-Zr fuels. These address deficiencies in our fundamental knowledge, fuel fabrication and handling techniques, characterization methods and procedures, modeling capability, and use of coupled experiments and mesoscale simulations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Burkes · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 45810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.035 ↗
2. Hofman · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 1997 · 31 · 8310.1016/0149-1970(96)00005-4 ↗
3. O'Boyle · 1970 · 720
4. Kurata · IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 9 · 1202210.1088/1757-899X/9/1/012022 ↗
5. Aitkaliyeva · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2016 · 473 · 7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.02.022 ↗
6. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 27210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.018 ↗
7. Janney · 2015
8. Petri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 240 · 13110.1016/S0022-3115(96)00669-1 ↗
9. Sohn · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 31710.1016/S0022-3115(99)00290-1 ↗
10. Kittel · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1971 · 15 · 37310.1016/0029-5493(71)90076-8 ↗
11. Kittel · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 110.1016/0022-3115(93)90193-3 ↗
12. Hofman · Metallurgical Transactions A · 1990 · 21 · 51710.1007/BF02671924 ↗
13. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 359 · 1710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.013 ↗
14. Galloway · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2015 · 286 · 110.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.01.014 ↗
15. Murphy · 1969 · 61
16. Harbur · 1970 · 1
17. Mariani · 2009
18. Hirschhorn · Ann. Nucl. Energy · 2019 · 124 · 49010.1016/j.anucene.2018.10.029 ↗
19. Saunders · 1998 · vol.1
20. D. Schwen, L. K. Aagesen, J. W. Peterson, M. R. Tonks (2017).
21. Burkes · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 396 · 4910.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.053 ↗
22. Trybus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 5010.1016/0022-3115(93)90198-8 ↗
23. Leibowitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1991 · 184 · 5910.1016/0022-3115(91)90533-D ↗
24. Leibowitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 167 · 7610.1016/0022-3115(89)90426-1 ↗
25. Okamoto · J. Phase Equilibria · 1995 · 16 · 400
26. Lawson · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1996 · 3210.1107/S0108768195006811 ↗
27. JEMS (EMS Java version)
28. Zachariasen · Acta Crystallogr. · 1963 · 16
29. Simmons · Scripta Mater. · 2000 · 43 · 93510.1016/S1359-6462(00)00517-0 ↗
30. Okamoto · J. Phase Equilibria · 1996 · 215 · 141
31. Sheldon · Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1989 · 10 · 16510.1007/BF02881432 ↗