A comparative study on the compatibility of liquid lead–gold eutectic and liquid lead–bismuth eutectic with T91 and SS 316LN steels
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Liquid lead–gold eutectic (LGE) is considered as a potential target material for high power spallation sources. In the present work, the corrosion effects of LGE on T91 and SS 316LN steels have been investigated in comparison with that of liquid lead–bismuth eutectic (LBE) under the same testing conditions. Two tests were conducted at 400 °C for 1800 h and at 450 °C for 1300 h, in which specimens of the two steels were exposed to 1 m/s flowing LGE and LBE. Surface inspections showed that the specimens underwent a mixed corrosion mode of dissolution and oxidation. The results obtained from the SS 316LN specimens are very interesting. Firstly, EDX (electron energy dispersion X-ray spectrometry) analyses revealed that Ni, Cr and Mn have a higher dissolution rate in LGE than in LBE. Secondly, it was observed that LBE attacked strongly on grain-boundaries (GBs) and twin-boundaries (TBs), while LGE did not preferentially attack GBs and TBs. Further, the diffusion or penetration paths of LBE look straight, while those of LGE look like a complex network. In the attacked regions the chemical composition of the steel did not change much in the LBE case, but changed greatly in the LGE case. The T91 specimens exhibited considerably weaker corrosion effects under the present testing conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Medarde · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 411 · 7210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.034 ↗
2. K. Thomsen, K. Conder, Y. Dai, D. Kiselev, M. Medarde, R. Moormann, E. Platacis, E. Pomjakushina, S. Török, L. Zanini, P. Zimmermann, in: The 19th Meeting of the International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources (ICANS-XIX), March 2010, Switzerland.
3. L. Zanini, F. Carinci, D. Kiselev, K. Thomsen, Neutronic and nuclear behavior of lead–gold eutectic as target material for ESS, in press.
4. K. Thomsen, E. Platacis, O. Lielausis, I. Bucenieks, A. Ziks, I. Romančuks, K. Kravalis, L. Buligins, R. Moormann, Experience with a first LGE loop and proposal for further investigations in flowing LGE, in press.
5. The proceedings of the 4th to 9th International Workshop on Spallation Materials Technology, published as special issues of Journal of Nuclear Materials, vols. 296, 318, 343, 356, 377 and 398.
6. Y. Dai, An overview of structural materials for applications in spallation targets, in press.
7. S. Heinitz, J. Neuhausen, S. Koechli, D. Schumann, Ann. Rep. of Radio- & Environ. Chemistry, University Bern & PSI (2010), pp. 40.
8. In Handbook on Lead–bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-hydraulics and Technologies, OECD/NEA, 2007, ISBN 978-92-64-99002-9 (Chapter 6).
9. Fazio · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 318 · 32510.1016/S0022-3115(03)00009-6 ↗
10. Wagner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 1210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.057 ↗
11. Benamati · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 301 · 2310.1016/S0022-3115(01)00723-1 ↗
12. Kondo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 343 · 34910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.08.037 ↗
13. Gnecco · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 18510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.013 ↗
14. Kieser · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 40510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.327 ↗
15. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 22210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.039 ↗