Influence of instrument conditions on the evaporation behavior of uranium dioxide with UV laser-assisted atom probe tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Atom probe tomography (APT) provides the ability to detect subnanometer chemical variations spatially, with high accuracy. However, it is known that compositional accuracy can be affected by experimental conditions. A study of the effect of laser energy, specimen base temperature, and detection rate is performed on the evaporation behavior of uranium dioxide (UO2). In laser-assisted mode, tip geometry and standing voltage also contribute to the evaporation behavior. In this investigation, it was determined that modifying the detection rate and temperature did not affect the evaporation behavior as significantly as laser energy. It was also determined that three laser evaporation regimes are present in UO2. Very low laser energy produces a behavior similar to DC-field evaporation, moderate laser energy produces the desired laser-assisted field evaporation characteristic and high laser energy induces thermal effects, negatively altering the evaporation behavior. The need for UO2 to be analyzed under moderate laser energies to produce accurate stoichiometry distinguishes it from other oxides. The following experimental conditions providing the best combination of mass resolving power, accurate stoichiometry, and uniform evaporation behavior: 50 K, 10 pJ laser energy, a detection rate of 0.003 atoms per pulse, and a 100 kHz repetition rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap, in: U.S. Department of Energy, 2010.
2. Olander · 1976
3. Rondinella · Mater. Today · 2010 · 13 · 2410.1016/S1369-7021(10)70221-2 ↗
4. Bruno · Elements · 2006 · 2 · 34310.2113/gselements.2.6.343 ↗
5. Thomas · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 188 · 8010.1016/0022-3115(92)90457-V ↗
6. Iglesias · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 270 · 2110.1016/S0022-3115(98)00738-7 ↗
7. Bruemmer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 274 · 29910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00075-6 ↗
8. Fink · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00273-1 ↗
9. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 401 · 11810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.007 ↗
10. Kelly · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 03110110.1063/1.2709758 ↗
11. Cerezo · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 72010.1016/j.ultramic.2007.02.025 ↗
12. Müller · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1968 · 39 · 8310.1063/1.1683116 ↗
13. Blavette · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 43210.1038/363432a0 ↗
14. Cerezo · Mater. Today · 2007 · 10 · 3610.1016/S1369-7021(07)70306-1 ↗
15. Gault · 2012
16. Vella · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 04432110.1063/1.3610523 ↗
17. Vurpillot · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 12550210.1088/0022-3727/42/12/125502 ↗
18. Kelly · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 18 · 8110.1016/j.cossms.2013.11.001 ↗
19. Silaeva · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 17 · 21110.1016/j.cossms.2013.08.001 ↗
20. Kirchhofer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 436 · 2310.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.052 ↗
21. Devaraj · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 99310.1021/jz400015h ↗
22. Houard · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 12541110.1103/PhysRevB.81.125411 ↗
23. Yao · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 64810.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.032 ↗
24. Miller · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1981 · 19 · 5710.1116/1.571017 ↗
25. Pang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 15740110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.157401 ↗
26. Thompson · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 13110.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
27. Li · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 58910.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.011 ↗
28. Mountanabbir · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98
29. Hono · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 57610.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.020 ↗
30. Gault · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 09490110.1063/1.3657846 ↗
31. Tsukada · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 56710.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.011 ↗
32. Tsong · Surf. Sci. · 1978 · 70 · 21110.1016/0039-6028(78)90410-7 ↗
33. Schoenes · J. Appl. Phys. · 1978 · 49 · 146310.1063/1.324978 ↗
34. Szpunar · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2013 · 74 · 163210.1016/j.jpcs.2013.06.007 ↗
35. Bachhav · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 58410.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.023 ↗
36. Aring · J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 38 · 149610.1063/1.1709680 ↗
37. Gault · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 09410110.1063/1.1871342 ↗
38. Gault · Ultramicroscopy · 2012 · 113 · 18210.1016/j.ultramic.2011.06.005 ↗
39. Muller · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 06490810.1063/1.3695461 ↗
40. Sha · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 04350310.1063/1.2837626 ↗
41. Tasker · Surf. Sci. · 1979 · 87 · 31510.1016/0039-6028(79)90531-4 ↗
42. Gault · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 37810.1016/S1369-7021(12)70164-5 ↗
43. Gault · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 121510.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.017 ↗
44. Nakamura · Surf. Sci. · 1969 · 17 · 34610.1016/0039-6028(69)90103-4 ↗
45. Marquis · Mater. Today · 2010 · 13 · 3410.1016/S1369-7021(10)70184-X ↗
46. Bunton · Microsc. Microanal. · 2007 · 13 · 41810.1017/S1431927607070869 ↗
47. Griffiths · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 151 · 31310.1016/0022-3115(88)90025-6 ↗
48. B. Valderrama, H.B. Henderson, L. He, J. Pakarinen, J. Gan, T. Allen, M.V. Manuel, Irradiation induced chemistry changes in oxide fuel materials, in: TMS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 2014.
49. Marçalo · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2009 · 113 · 1259910.1021/jp904862a ↗
50. Müller · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 48710.1016/j.ultramic.2010.11.019 ↗
51. Sha · Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 58010.1016/j.ultramic.2008.10.012 ↗
52. Tang · Ultramicroscopy · 2010 · 110 · 83610.1016/j.ultramic.2010.03.003 ↗