journal article·2009-04

Materials and design interface

S. Sharafat, G.R. Odette, J. Blanchard

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The unprecedented demands faced by fusion structures primarily derive from severe time varying thermal-mechanical loading of complex, large scale, and highly interconnected heat transfer-energy conversion structures. This grand challenge is often much too narrowly couched in terms of the development of radiation damage resistant materials, while the enormously larger challenge is the creation of material systems and multifunctional structures. In addition, the fusion system designer is faced with the untenable situation that neither the fully functional materials, nor the requisite computational tools, nor experimental simulation facilities currently exist for reliable integrity and lifetime assessments of fusion reactor structures. Considering the absence of material information and design tools, neither the materials nor the fusion designer can follow standard design processes. The design process has to become actively materials-related while materials development must closely follow design process needs. This indispensible interaction between materials and design processes leads to a ‘concurrent materials-structure design’ path, which is necessary to meet the enormous materials-structural engineering challenges of fusion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Enoeda · Nucl. Fusion · 2003 · 43 · 183710.1088/0029-5515/43/12/026 ↗
2. Sagara Sagara · Fus. Technol. · 2001 · 39 · 753
3. Wong · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2004 · 72 · 24510.1016/j.fusengdes.2004.07.011 ↗
4. Aktaa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 55010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.237 ↗
5. Leshukov · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2002 · 61&62 · 33310.1016/S0920-3796(02)00215-6 ↗
6. Urata · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56&57 · 84910.1016/S0920-3796(01)00364-7 ↗
7. Ehrlich · Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. A · 1999 · 357 · 59510.1098/rsta.1999.0343 ↗
8. Bolt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.005 ↗
9. Baker · J. Fus. Energy · 2005 · 24
10. Andreani · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 2510.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.005 ↗
11. Shimomura · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 46710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.215 ↗
12. Bloom · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.02.007 ↗
13. Sharafat · Fus. Eng. Des. · 1991 · 18 · 21510.1016/0920-3796(91)90130-I ↗
14. Katoh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 65910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.032 ↗
15. Shikama · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 99510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.231 ↗
16. Linke · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 142210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.04.028 ↗
17. Odette · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 56110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.045 ↗
18. Ando · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 12210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.157 ↗
19. Li · J. Nucl. Mater · 2007 · 361 · 19210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.017 ↗
20. Sunyk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 140410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.04.041 ↗
21. Sharafat · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 133710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.252 ↗
22. Barabash · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 2110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.017 ↗
23. ITER Structural Design Criteria for in-Vessel Components (lSDC), ITER IDoMS S74MA1 97-12-12 RO.2, Appendix A IDoMS G74MA2 98-06-26 FI, 1998.
24. S. Majumdar, P. Smith, in: Proceedings of the fourth International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology (ISFNT-4), Tokyo, April 6–11, 1997.
25. Dell’Orco · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 236610.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.04.008 ↗
26. Leichtle · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 240610.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.08.007 ↗