Mechanical properties and microstructure of helium-implanted beryllium
Source abstract
Abstract
0.2 mm thick specimens of beryllium have been homogeneously implanted with helium. Implantation temperatures ranged from 100 to 600 °C, and final helium concentrations from 30 to 800 appm. Tensile tests at temperatures between 20 and 600 °C were carried out with testing temperature both equal to and lower than the implantation temperatures. For practicality all conditions of helium-implanted specimens, ductility decreased and yield and ultimate tensile strength increased as compared to the unimplanted specimens. The amount of embrittlement and strengthening, however, depended sensitively on implantation dose, implantation temperature, and tensile test temperature. The formation of helium bubbles, dislocation loops, and dislocation networks and the fracture modes were observed by transmission and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Two ranges of embrittlement can be distinguished. They are attributed to different mechanisms: matrix strengthening is the dominant mechanism at low temperatures, and loss of grain boundary cohesion at high temperatures. It is concluded that in both temperature regimes the embrittlement is dominated by helium and not by the displacement defects introduced by its implantation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Gelles · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 212–215 · 2910.1016/0022-3115(94)90030-2 ↗
2. F. Scaffidi-Argentina (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth IEA International Workshop on Beryllium Technology for Fusion, FZKA Report 6462 (2000)10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00219-1 ↗
3. Schroeder · Nucl. Eng. Des./Fusion · 1985 · 2 · 6510.1016/0167-899X(85)90006-0 ↗
4. Schroeder · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1991 · 179–181 · 11810.1016/0022-3115(91)90025-3 ↗
5. Ullmaier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 26210.1016/S0022-3115(97)00226-2 ↗
6. H. Ullmaier, J. Chen, J. Nucl. Mater., in press
7. Fleischer · 1964 · 93
8. Kocks · Progr. Mater. Sci. · 1975 · 19 · 110.1016/0079-6425(75)90005-5 ↗
9. Lucas · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 206 · 28710.1016/0022-3115(93)90129-M ↗
10. Trinkaus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 10110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00563-3 ↗
11. H. Tinkaus, private communication
12. Moons · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 82310.1016/S0022-3115(96)00139-0 ↗
13. L.L. Snead, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Fusion Materials Semiannual Report DOE/ER-0313/24 (1998) 215