Crystal orientation dependence of surface modification in molybdenum mirror irradiated with helium ions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The crystal orientation dependence on a surface damage in molybdenum mirror has been investigated under the irradiation with 3 keV helium ions to a fluence of 10 22 ions/m 2 . A strong correlation between the surface roughening and the grain orientation was confirmed from SEM–EBSD analysis. It was found that significant surface roughening including crater-like depressions is formed on the grain surfaces with crystalline planes close to (1 0 0), while relatively smooth surface remains on grains with the other directions. In contrast, the reflectivity measurement of the single crystal molybdenum with a spectroscopic ellipsometry showed smaller reduction in (1 0 0) sample than in (1 1 0) and (1 1 1) samples. The smallest helium desorption in (1 0 0) sample was also detected with thermal desorption spectroscopy in comparison with them in (1 1 0) and (1 1 1) samples, which indicates (1 1 0) and (1 1 1) samples include the large amount of defects acting as effective trapping site for He atoms. A cross-sectional TEM observation actually showed a relatively large bubbles at sub-surface regions of (1 1 0) sample. These results indicate that the optical reflectivity should be affected by not only a top surface profile but also internal radiation damages such as high density of helium bubbles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Costley · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 55 · 33110.1016/S0920-3796(01)00200-9 ↗
2. Voitsenya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 147610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.249 ↗
3. Sugie · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 148110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.248 ↗
4. Voitsenya · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 191910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00129-9 ↗
5. Balden · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 151510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.240 ↗
6. Belyaeva · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 345 · 10110.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.066 ↗
7. Miyamoto · Plasma Dev. Oper. · 2009 · 17 · 15510.1080/10519990902885248 ↗
8. Ono · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · T138 · 01406510.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014065 ↗
9. Nishitani · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1998 · 42 · 44310.1016/S0920-3796(98)00159-8 ↗
10. Farnum · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 219 · 22410.1016/0022-3115(94)00684-9 ↗
11. Litnovsky · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 139510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.281 ↗
12. Akiyama · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 10350110.1063/1.2786938 ↗
13. Ohno · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S87910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.190 ↗
14. Miyamoto · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 06503510.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065035 ↗
15. Fujii · J. Less-Common Met. · 1984 · 96 · 29710.1016/0022-5088(84)90208-X ↗
16. Ran · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2012 · 289 · 3910.1016/j.nimb.2012.08.008 ↗
17. Sefta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S49310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.101 ↗
18. Gruber · J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 38 · 24310.1063/1.1708962 ↗