Optimisation of purple dyeing with Mexican cochineal in cotton with multivariate analysis and the response surface method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to optimise the dyeing process of cotton fabrics using Mexican cochineal ( Dactylopius coccus Costa). The objective is to obtain purple hues through the design of experiments and by using multivariate analysis. Plackett–Burman experimental designs and the response surface method were used to systematically optimise the dyeing parameters. The meta‐mordanting process was the most critical factor affecting the achievement of purple hues, followed by cochineal concentration, toner concentration and dyeing time. The multivariate analysis of principal component analysis with discriminant analysis was applied to determine the significance of washing methods and toner types. Various traditional Mexican toners, including tequesquite , cardon and ash, were evaluated. The washing method was not significant, while the toner type showed a tendency towards clustering, indicating a significant effect on the dyeing process. The most recommended method was the one using tequesquite , with 20% on weight of fabric (owf) cochineal, 5% owf toner and a dyeing time of 66 minutes. Cardon was recommended as a viable toner alternative. This research provides a reproducible method for achieving desired purple shades, preserving traditional dyeing techniques from Mexican indigenous cultures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Microbial Metabolism and Applications · Bee Products Chemical Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias para la Investigación y Conservación del Patrimonio Cultural (LANCIC), Instituto de Química Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico City Mexico
Laboratorio del Área de Control de Calidad, Dirección General de Proveeduría Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Mexico City Mexico
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jrs.265110.1002/jrs.2651 ↗
2. El tejido en el México Antiguo
3. Grana Cochinilla VE · 2018
4. Cardon D · 2007
5. 10.1002/col.2202810.1002/col.22028 ↗
6. 10.1002/col.2219710.1002/col.22197 ↗
7. 10.1186/s40494‐023‐01108‐x10.1186/s40494‐023‐01108‐x ↗
8. 10.1515/978311077711610.1515/9783110777116 ↗
9. 10.1111/cote.1216910.1111/cote.12169 ↗
10. 10.1515/978311077712310.1515/9783110777123 ↗
11. Materiales colorantes prehispánicos
12. Sahagún FB · 2011
13. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.00410.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.004 ↗
14. 10.3390/heritage704009410.3390/heritage7040094 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.07.00210.1016/j.dyepig.2006.07.002 ↗
16. 10.1080/15440478.2022.212896810.1080/15440478.2022.2128968 ↗
17. 10.1080/15440478.2022.216218710.1080/15440478.2022.2162187 ↗
18. 10.3390/colorants202001510.3390/colorants2020015 ↗
19. 10.1080/15440478.2023.228205610.1080/15440478.2023.2282056 ↗
20. 10.21448/ijsm.147953010.21448/ijsm.1479530 ↗
21. 10.1111/cote.1203210.1111/cote.12032 ↗
22. 10.1111/cote.1228810.1111/cote.12288 ↗
23. 10.1111/J.1478‐4408.2010.00276.X10.1111/J.1478‐4408.2010.00276.X ↗
24. 10.31881/TLR.2023.04410.31881/TLR.2023.044 ↗
25. 10.3390/molecules2703110010.3390/molecules27031100 ↗
26. 10.1007/s12221‐020‐9153‐z10.1007/s12221‐020‐9153‐z ↗
27. 10.1080/15440478.2019.162374210.1080/15440478.2019.1623742 ↗
28. 10.1080/15440478.2022.210818410.1080/15440478.2022.2108184 ↗
29. Mexica.Mendoza Codex.1542https://codicemendoza.inah.gob.mx/inicio.php
30. 10.1002/COL.2282810.1002/COL.22828 ↗
31. 10.1039/B104595B10.1039/B104595B ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2010.00273.x10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2010.00273.x ↗
33. 10.1111/cote.1219910.1111/cote.12199 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2008.05.00810.1016/j.dyepig.2008.05.008 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.03.00610.1016/j.dyepig.2005.03.006 ↗
36. Río y Dueñas I · 2006
37. Hollen N · 1979
38. 10.1201/978142004588810.1201/9781420045888 ↗
39. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), Cámara Nacional de la Industria Textil (CANAINTEX) · 2024
40. Arroyo Ortiz L · 2014
41. Pontón Zúñiga R · 2007
42. Romero Canseco JA · 2006
43. Vigueras AL · 2004
44. 10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.00610.1016/j.culher.2015.11.006 ↗
45. Veropoulidou R · 2012 · 103
46. 10.2307/310576010.2307/3105760 ↗
47. 10.3390/su1113359510.3390/su11133595 ↗
48. 10.1111/maec.1250910.1111/maec.12509 ↗
49. 10.1108/PRT‐03‐2021‐003410.1108/PRT‐03‐2021‐0034 ↗
50. 10.1108/RJTA‐10‐2020‐011510.1108/RJTA‐10‐2020‐0115 ↗
51. 10.1080/15440478.2020.182129310.1080/15440478.2020.1821293 ↗
52. Miller J · 2018
53. Gutiérrez Pulido H · 2012
54. Box GEP · 2005
55. 10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.0C0038510.1021/ACSSYNBIO.0C00385 ↗
56. Rodrigues MI · 2015
57. 10.1021/pr060594q10.1021/pr060594q ↗
58. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.13607810.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136078 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.10820210.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108202 ↗
60. RuizPO.Tiñendo la lana con la Grana cochinilla ‐ YouTube. Video. February 10 2021https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciZbMAjcLsg.Accessed April 13 2023
61. Roquero A · 1981
62. Varela GarcíaE.Tinción de Lana Con Grana Cochinilla Mexicana.2022Estudio de Diversos Factores Usando Diseño de Experimentos. Thesis to obtain the Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemistry. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
63. 10.1007/s13659‐020‐00249‐x10.1007/s13659‐020‐00249‐x ↗
64. 10.15174/AU.2016.98710.15174/AU.2016.987 ↗
65. 10.1016/0960‐8524(91)90207‐Z10.1016/0960‐8524(91)90207‐Z ↗
66. 10.1016/J.BCAB.2021.10224510.1016/J.BCAB.2021.102245 ↗
67. 10.1002/qre.83910.1002/qre.839 ↗
68. 10.2307/126894110.2307/1268941 ↗
69. 10.1107/S056774088201016410.1107/S0567740882010164 ↗
70. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020‐3.RLTS.T152144A183111167.en10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020‐3.RLTS.T152144A183111167.en ↗