journal article·2013-10

Microstructures of diffusion bonded SiC ceramics using Ti and Mo interlayers

Yang-Il Jung, Sun-Han Kim, Hyun-Gil Kim, Jeong-Yong Park, Weon-Ju Kim

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 441· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract SiC plates were diffusion bonded using metallic interlayers of Ti and Mo foils. For the joining, a uniaxial pressure of ∼7 MPa was applied at 1400 °C for 1 h in a vacuum. The interfacial microstructures along with their atomic compositions of the SiC/SiC joints were analyzed. For the Ti interlayer, Ti was converted into a Ti 3 SiC 2 phase owing to the diffusion of silicon and carbon from the SiC part. A crystallographic orientation relationship was found between the SiC and Ti 3 SiC 2 grains. At the middle of the Ti interlayer, a TiSi 2 phase also existed, forming a dual-phase region. For the Mo interlayer, the diffusion of silicon into Mo induced the formation of the Mo 5 Si 3 C phase at the SiC/Mo interface. An unreacted metallic phase was still observed in the middle of the Mo insert. The shear strengths of the joints were 67 MPa and 76 MPa for the Ti and Mo interlayers, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Yueh, D. Carpenter, H. Feinroth, Clay in clay, Nuclear Engineering International, pp. 14–16, 2010.
2. G. Griffith, US Department of Energy: Accident resistant SiC clad nuclear fuel development, INL/CON-11-23186, 2011.
3. D.M. Carpenter, An assessment of silicon carbide as a cladding material for light water reactors, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.
4. Deck · Progr. Nucl. Energy · 2012 · 57 · 3810.1016/j.pnucene.2011.10.002 ↗
5. Hallstadius · Progr. Nucl. Energy · 2012 · 57 · 7110.1016/j.pnucene.2011.10.008 ↗
6. Katoh · Curr. Opinion Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 16 · 14310.1016/j.cossms.2012.03.005 ↗
7. Fernández · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2000 · 20 · 264110.1016/S0955-2219(00)00156-4 ↗
8. Colombo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 278 · 12710.1016/S0022-3115(99)00268-8 ↗
9. Hinoki · Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. · 2005 · 26 · 39910.1002/9780470291221.ch47 ↗
10. Morozumi · J. Mater. Sci. · 1985 · 20 · 397610.1007/BF00552387 ↗
11. Naka · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1997 · 28 · 138510.1007/s11661-997-0275-3 ↗
12. B. V. Cockeram, The diffusion bonding of silicon carbide and boron carbide using refractory metals, Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, B-T-3255, 1999.
13. Cockeram · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 88 · 189210.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00381.x ↗
14. Dong · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2011 · 176 · 6010.1016/j.mseb.2010.09.002 ↗
15. Henager · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 37510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.084 ↗
16. Ferraris · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 375 · 41010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.020 ↗
17. Riccardi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 56210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.118 ↗
18. Y. Katoh, D.F. Wilson, C.W. Forsberg, Assessment of silicon carbide composites for advanced salt-cooled reactors, ORNL/TM-2007/168, 2007.10.2172/982717 ↗
19. Buchheit · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 85410.1016/j.intermet.2008.03.010 ↗
20. Zhou · J. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 35 · 434310.1023/A:1004848705481 ↗
21. Zhu · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 2000 · 19 · 152910.1023/A:1006760719459 ↗
22. Snead · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 371 · 32910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.016 ↗