Role of grain boundary and dislocation loop in H blistering in W: A density functional theory assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
We report a first-principles density functional theory study on the role of grain boundary and dislocation loop in H blistering in W. At low temperature, the {\Sugma}3(111) tilt grain boundary, when combined with a vacancy of vanishing formation energy, can trap up to nine H atoms per (1x1) unit in (111) plane. This amount of H weakens the cohesion across the boundary to an extent that a cleavage along the GB is already exothermic. At high temperature, this effect can be still significant. For an infinitely large dislocation loop in (100) plane, four H can be trapped per (1x1) unit even above room temperature, incurring a decohesion strong enough to break the crystal. Our numerical results demonstrate unambiguously the grain boundaries and dislocation loops can serve as precursors of H blistering. In addition, no H2 molecules can be formed in either environment before fracture of W bonds starts, well explaining the H blistering in the absence of voids during non-damaging irradiation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-pressure geophysics and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Causey · Phys. Scripta · 2001 · T94 · 910.1238/Physica.Topical.094a00009 ↗
2. Causey · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 300 · 9110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00732-2 ↗
3. Skinner · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 54 · 89110.13182/FST54-891 ↗
4. Ye · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 7210.1016/S0022-3115(02)01349-1 ↗
5. Alimov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 375 · 19210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.008 ↗
6. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 88710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.137 ↗
7. Franzen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 108210.1016/S0022-3115(97)80198-5 ↗
8. Xiao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 421 · 17610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.019 ↗
9. Sze · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 264 · 8910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00483-8 ↗
10. Haasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 52010.1016/S0022-3115(98)00586-8 ↗
11. Myers · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1992 · 64 · 55910.1103/RevModPhys.64.559 ↗
12. Liu · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 17210310.1103/PhysRevB.79.172103 ↗
13. Ohsawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 18411710.1103/PhysRevB.82.184117 ↗
14. Heinola · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 09410210.1103/PhysRevB.82.094102 ↗
15. Johnson · J. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 25 · 31510.1557/JMR.2010.0036 ↗
16. Jiang · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 83 · 13411210.1103/PhysRevB.81.134112 ↗
17. Zhou · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 02501610.1088/0029-5515/50/2/025016 ↗
18. Attado · Acta Metall. · 1967 · 15 · 39510.1016/0001-6160(67)90221-0 ↗
19. Fuks · Surf. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 6 · 70510.1142/S0218625X9900069X ↗
20. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
21. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
23. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
24. Birnbaum · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1994 · 176 · 19110.1016/0921-5093(94)90975-X ↗
25. Rice · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1989 · 107 · 2310.1016/0921-5093(89)90372-9 ↗
26. Geng · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 714910.1103/PhysRevB.60.7149 ↗
27. Geng · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 16541510.1103/PhysRevB.63.165415 ↗
28. Tompkins · 1978
29. Alimov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337 · 61910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.082 ↗