Size effect of primary Y2O3 additions on the characteristics of the nanostructured ferritic ODS alloys: Comparing as-milled and as-milled/annealed alloys using S/TEM
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The need for providing S/TEM evidence to clarify the mechanisms of nano-scale precipitate formation was the motivation of this investigation. In this study, an Fe–14Cr–0.4Ti alloy was ball-milled with different amounts of Y 2 O 3 content up to 10 wt.%, and then annealed at temperatures up to 1100 °C. Micron-size Y 2 O 3 particles were substituted for the nano-size counterpart to elucidate the mechanism of oxide precipitate formation. The S/TEM studies revealed that the microstructure of the alloy with 10 wt.% yttria contained amorphous undissolved Y 2 O 3 after ball milling, while a small part of the initial oxide particles were dissolved into the solid solution. Consequently, when the amount of yttria was reduced to 1 wt.%, the amorphous phase of the yttria vanished and the whole content of Y 2 O 3 was dissolved into the BCC solid solution. Defect analysis of precipitates on the annealed samples via S/TEM and micro-hardness studies revealed that the use of micron-size primary oxide particles can produce nano-size precipitates, stable up to temperatures as high as 1100 °C, and uniformly distributed throughout the microstructure. This study indicates that the use of high energy ball milling along with micron-size primary oxide particles can lead to nanostructured ferritic ODS alloys without the use of nano-size primary oxide additions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. J.J. Fischer, Dispersion Strengthened Ferritic Alloy for Use in Liquid–Metal Fast Breeder Reactors (LMFBRS), US4075010 A, 1978.
2. Hayashi · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 140710.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.038 ↗
3. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 749 · 307
4. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 773 · 307
5. Alinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 484 · 307
6. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 6510.1016/0022-3115(93)90200-I ↗
7. Ukai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 7410.1016/0022-3115(93)90201-9 ↗
8. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 39 · 87210.1080/18811248.2002.9715271 ↗
9. Lindau · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 76910.1016/S0022-3115(02)01045-0 ↗
10. Schaeublin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307-311 · 77810.1016/S0022-3115(02)01193-5 ↗
11. Sokolov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 21310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.143 ↗
12. McClintock · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 35310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.024 ↗
13. Parish · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 445 · 25110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.002 ↗
14. Monnet · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 31110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.05.018 ↗
15. Miller · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 67210.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.036 ↗
16. Ukai · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 39 · 77810.1080/18811248.2002.9715260 ↗
17. Boulnat · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2013 · 44 · 246110.1007/s11661-013-1719-6 ↗
18. Okada · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 1996 · 33 · 93610.1080/18811248.1996.9732035 ↗
19. Hoelzer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 16610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.151 ↗
20. Alinger · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
21. Okuda · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1995 · 14 · 160010.1007/BF00455428 ↗
22. Miller · Intermetallics · 2005 · 13 · 38710.1016/j.intermet.2004.07.036 ↗
23. Miller · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2003 · 353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
24. Alinger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 38210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.042 ↗
25. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.004 ↗
26. Miao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 20810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.144 ↗
27. Miao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 5910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.042 ↗
28. Miller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 33810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.085 ↗
29. Yamashita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 37710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.041 ↗
30. Yamashita∗ · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 52510.1080/09500830412331303609 ↗
31. Klimiankou · Micron · 2005 · 36 · 110.1016/j.micron.2004.08.001 ↗
32. Kishimoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 36910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.044 ↗
33. Klimiankou · J. Cryst. Growth · 2003 · 249 · 38110.1016/S0022-0248(02)02134-6 ↗
34. Sakasegawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 384 · 11510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.001 ↗
35. Subramanian · Prog. Solid State Chem. · 1983 · 15 · 5510.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-8 ↗
36. Ault · Acta Crystallogr. · 1966 · 20 · 41010.1107/S0365110X6600094X ↗
37. Mumme · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1968 · 24 · 132710.1107/S0567740868004243 ↗
38. Mizutani · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1976 · 59 · 16810.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09459.x ↗
39. Miller · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 29 · 117410.1179/1743284713Y.0000000207 ↗
40. Hirata · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 568610.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.042 ↗
41. Brandes · J. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 47 · 391310.1007/s10853-012-6249-x ↗
42. Hirata · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 92210.1038/nmat3150 ↗
43. Wu · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 345610.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.012 ↗
44. Klimiankou · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 34710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.083 ↗
45. Ribis · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 23810.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.042 ↗
46. Zhong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 428 · 15410.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.12.028 ↗
47. Dai · Powder Technol. · 2012 · 217 · 28110.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.039 ↗
48. Toualbi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 22510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.071 ↗
49. Zhang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 582 · 76910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.069 ↗
50. Saber · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 556 · 66410.1016/j.msea.2012.07.045 ↗
51. Susila · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 457910.1016/j.msea.2011.02.078 ↗
52. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2006 · 57 · 6410.1016/j.matchar.2005.12.007 ↗