journal article·2015-07Open access

Displacement cascades and defect annealing in tungsten, Part II: Object kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of tungsten cascade aging

Giridhar Nandipati, Wahyu Setyawan, Howard L. Heinisch, Kenneth J. Roche, Richard J. Kurtz, Brian D. Wirth

Abstract

We describe the results of object kinetic Monte Carlo (OKMC) simulations of the annealing of primary cascade damage in bulk tungsten using a comprehensive database of cascades obtained from molecular dynamics [1] as a function of primary knock-on atom (PKA) energy and direction, and temperatures of 300, 1025 and 2050 K. An increase in SIA clustering but decrease in vacancy clustering with temperature combined with disparate mobilities of SIAs versus vacancies causes an interesting temperature effect on cascade annealing, which is quite different from what one would expect. The annealing efficiency (ratio of number of defects after and before annealing) exhibits an inverse U-shape curve as a function of temperature. In addition, we will also describe the capabilities of our newly developed OKMC code; KSOME (kinetic simulations of microstructure evolution) used to carryout these simulations
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Setyawan, G. Nandipati, H.L. Heinisch, K.J. Roche, R.J. Kurtz, B.D. Wirth, (companion paper Part I) .
2. Janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
3. Bolt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.005 ↗
4. Roth · Plasma Phys. Control · 2008 · 50 · 10300110.1088/0741-3335/50/10/103001 ↗
5. Pintsuk · 2012
6. Stoller · 2012
7. Was · 2007
8. Björkas · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 02410510.1103/PhysRevB.85.024105 ↗
9. Becquart · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 352 · 3910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.022 ↗
10. Ortiz · J. Comput-Aid. Mater. Des · 2007 · 14 · 17110.1007/s10820-007-9082-9 ↗
11. Torre · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 352 · 4210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.040 ↗
12. Heinisch · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 117 · 4610.1016/0022-3115(83)90008-9 ↗
13. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 382 · 7710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.047 ↗
14. Becquart · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 403 · 7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.003 ↗
15. Derlet · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 5410710.1103/PhysRevB.76.054107 ↗
16. Gao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 21310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00180-4 ↗
17. Zarkadoula · J. Phys: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 125402
18. Xu · J. Phys: Condens. Matter · 2012 · 24 · 375402
19. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 443 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.001 ↗
20. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 423 · 10210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.020 ↗
21. Domain · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 12110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.037 ↗
22. Hudson · Philos. Mag. · 2005 · 85 · 66110.1080/14786430412331320026 ↗
23. Mason · J. Phys: Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 375701