journal article·2013-10

Computer simulation of displacement cascades in tungsten with modified F–S type potential

Baoqin Fu, Ben Xu, Wensheng Lai, Yue Yuan, Haiyan Xu, Chun Li, Yuzhen Jia, Wei Liu

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 441· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Tungsten has been used for divertor materials in fusion reactor, which requires them to withstand high-energy neutron radiation. The produced displacement cascade has usually been studied with molecular dynamics simulation. In these simulations, most of the discrepancies come from the low reliability of the potential. To overcome this drawback, the extended Finnis–Sinclair potential has been modified by connecting ZBL universal potential. The potential performs very well in the case of the interaction between tungsten and point defects, fits well with experimental and other theoretical results. In this paper, displacement cascades have been simulated in the scenario of detection of Frenkel pairs and point defect clusters, using our new modified potential. The time evolution of the Frenkel pair has been analyzed, through comparing with the NRT predicted results. The effects of primary knock-on energy and temperature on point defect production have also been analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Bjorkas · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2009 · 267 · 320410.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.123 ↗
2. Fikar · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 9710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.068 ↗
3. Fu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 427 · 26810.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.015 ↗
4. Fu · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2013 · 303 · 16210.1016/j.nimb.2012.11.024 ↗
5. Fu · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2013 · 303 · 410.1016/j.nimb.2013.01.052 ↗
6. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 271 · 5710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00730-2 ↗
7. Bacon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.002 ↗
8. Bacon · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 1999 · 153 · 8710.1016/S0168-583X(99)00041-5 ↗
9. Xu · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2003 · 206 · 12310.1016/S0168-583X(03)00697-9 ↗
10. Park · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2007 · 265 · 54710.1016/j.nimb.2007.10.003 ↗
11. Fikar · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2007 · 255 · 2710.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.007 ↗
12. Bjorkas · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 2007 · 259 · 85310.1016/j.nimb.2007.03.076 ↗
13. Dai · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · 4527
14. Finnis · Philos. Mag. A · 1984 · 50 · 4510.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
15. Ziegler · 1985
16. Neklyudov · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 11541810.1103/PhysRevB.78.115418 ↗
17. Kittel · 1996
18. Rasch · Philos. Mag. A · 1980 · 41 · 9110.1080/01418618008241833 ↗
19. Fu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 255 · 851110.1016/j.apsusc.2009.06.002 ↗
20. Nguyen-Manh · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 2010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
21. Juslin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 12352010.1063/1.2149492 ↗
22. Stoller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 2210.1016/S0022-3115(99)00204-4 ↗
23. Berendsen · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 368410.1063/1.448118 ↗
24. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329 · 115610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.270 ↗
25. Norgett · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 1975 · 33 · 5010.1016/0029-5493(75)90035-7 ↗
26. Robinson · 1969